Jump to content

Talk:K. C. Paul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is something logical . Request to add more Experimental basis claimed by this person.

[edit]

From some-other internet-resources (graffitis & videos), I see, this person's model about solar-system, is not "classically-geocentric" .

This person speaks, "day-&-night occurs due to diurnal rotation of Earth around own axis ... as matches with modern, Copernican model. But Sun's revolution around the Earth is the cause for variation of daylength & season-change. Whereas old geocentric model claims Earth is totally stagnant- neither revolving nor rotating.".

The modern, standard model that we learn in school textbooks, is ...

Diagram of the Earth's seasons as seen from the north. Far right: southern solstice



In this model, Sun is totally stagnant, & Earth possesses 2 kind of movements: 1. rotation, 2. revolution. Season change & daylength alteration is caused, because Earth is always tilted ~ 66+(1/2) degrees (with respect to the plane of orbit) or ~ 23+(1/2) degrees (with respect to the normal drawn on orbit plane); maintaining a same direction.


Earth's axial tilt is about 23.4°. It oscillates between 22.1° and 24.5° on a 41,000-year cycle and is currently decreasing.


Now, in this person's graffitis , like


Paul's one graffiti, propagating his theory
File:Https://astudentinkolkata.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/photo01461.jpg
graffitti

states a situation, that could be imagined, with just a little change in "frame of reference".

So, these scribbles may be correct or not (I don't know), but follows logic.

P.S: Carnot's theory (on thermodynamics), was originally wrong ... because Carnot didn't knew heat is form of energy. But there was something it Carnot's theory, that revolutionized thermodynamics. A mistake can also contain a truth.

I'll be grateful if more information about the experimental bases this person claims, are mentioned. All the resources, including newspapers & internet, focused mainly about this person's life & social-position. But no-one clearly mentions the experimental findings.

[edit]

Reference : Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDJtLbEJ8u4 2:43 ->  2:53 (*) -> 4:06


Interested anonymous (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Interested anonymous (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are none. He is not a scientist and didn't make any discoveries. 2001:9E8:4607:3E00:9933:8EF6:D8EA:A390 (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schizophrenic patient, doesn't need wiki.

[edit]

Schizophrenic patient, doesn't need wiki. 101.50.117.167 (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

Just dropping in from recent changes, but this doesn't seem to meet A7 at first glance. There are multiple articles over the years, even talk of a documentary. --Mlkj (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I don't see there's enough biographical information to be an article about him. The focus is on his nonsensical push of geocentrism. This would be better as a small mention in that article, there's no reason to have a WP:BLP article on this guy. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]