Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions
Functions or implementations or tests which do not work properly, do not meet notability criteria or are duplicates of another object can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.
If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in Wikifunctions:Report vandalism, or ping an administrator. Contact can also be made with an administrator on Telegram or IRC #wikipedia-abstract.
If it is a predefined item (it's ZID is less than 10000), please see Wikifunctions:Report a technical problem.
 | SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. |
| edit |
|
|---|
| Archives |
Unneded ZObject for an empty string. Current usage could be easily converted to use an empty string directly. --Ameisenigel (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- But it may sometimes be easier to read an object with a label instead of a string literal, or tell the intention better. I am a bit torn about such literals, I really don't know. I for sure do not have a principled stand on this yet. (Note that this comment is explicitly in my hat as a volunteer). --Denny (talk) 15:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- The interface should distinguish between different code points that are currently displayed as "". In the meantime, I guess it is convenient to have a literal Z6 for each invisible code point that is used in a composition or test case. (I feel a new implementation of is empty string (Z10008) coming on… is Empty string, composition (Z17075).)
- In any event, I do not believe that an object should be formally proposed for deletion on this page without a notice on its own talk page that notifies its watchers of what is proposed (except for recently created objects that fall into the categories listed in the first paragraph of this page). Perhaps we should have a “Consider for deletion” section or page? GrounderUK (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a broken built-in test, but regular users can't edit it to fix it. It has been replaced by string test of list without first element (Z12766) anyway. Unless there's a good reason I'm missing, I think we should minimise the use of all built-in tests, because they have an unnecessary layer of inflexibility. This one is broken, so should be deleted. --99of9 (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- As we've said before, this isn't the right venue for discussion of pre-defined Objects; can you file a Phabricator task? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Where have we said this before? 99of9 (talk) 01:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
created automatically by WF because of bug? So9q (talk) 11:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Done —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Remove all impl and tests. Duplicate of replace at end (Z11178) So9q (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Remove in favor of compositions
- Swedish declension, definitive plural, -a python (Z17950)
- swedish noun first declension definitive singular python (Z17734)
- swedish noun first declension plural python (Z17704)
So9q (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of add suffix "n" to string if it does not already end with "n" (Z17791) So9q (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Just convert the implementation into a composition (see Swedish noun, sixth declension, indefinite plural (same as singular) (Z17783)). GrounderUK (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of add suffix "n" to string if it does not already end with "n" (Z17791)So9q (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Just convert the Python implementation into a composition (see Swedish noun, sixth declension, indefinite plural (same as singular) (Z17783)).
- Please remember to sign requests that are not automatically signed.--GrounderUK (talk) 15:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of Echo (Z801) So9q (talk) 14:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve converted the Python implementation to a composition with string identity (Z11602) and suggest we retain the function and its tests. GrounderUK (talk) 15:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
This function was made by mistake -- ScienceD90 (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
| This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
|