User talk:Primefac

This is Primefac's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47Auto-archiving period: 15 days

Just curious, how did you recreate the RichardHornsby sockpuppet investigation previously known as Tsetstransport. Xtools edit count does not show it as a deleted edit. 182.239.240.50 (talk) 00:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what you mean, I haven't deleted or restored any SPI pages in years. Primefac (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think what he meant was [1] where you created a page on a page that has already been created without deleting it first. 60.227.138.38 (talk) 05:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

xtools doesn't always show all types of deletions, nor do log entries. Primefac (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What type of deletion is this? How do I do this on my own MediaWiki wiki. Is the log entry of the deletion only visible to administrators. 60.227.138.38 (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Oversight. Primefac (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you need to oversight it. Is it because the admin who deleted the page added something that needs to be oversighted in the reason. 182.239.240.50 (talk) 00:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content on the page met the oversight criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Primefac, not sure if you know about this yet but at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical elections/Proposed decision it looks like you've double-voted in proposed remedies 5.1, 6.1, and 7.1. DanCherek (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, not sure how I missed those. Primefac (talk) 18:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Any idea about this ES?102.173.223.161 (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been deleted. Primefac (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Primefac ,

How are you ? well I hope

I would like to tell you that my articleCercle d’études scientifiques Pierre Rayer — Wikipédia (wikipedia.org) does not appear on search engines, can you solve the problem for me please?

Inspiringflow (talk) 21:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hello, Inspiringflow,

Wikipedia has no control over how Google or Bing! or other search engines display their search results. It could take days, weeks or months for a Wikipedia article to appear on a search engine results page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Inspiringflow (talk page watcher) When creating articles about your own organisation you are, ipso facto, a paid editor. I have warned you and your surrogate account to comply with WP:PAID and given you both(!) the strong suggestion not to use two accounts. But you will know this already.

Wikipedia doesn't care much about search engines. They tend to index articles reasonably fast, although there is probably an unspecified delay to disappoint spammers. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were kind to a new user (in your edit summary). That was a truly good thing to do. No good deed goes unpunished, I fear.

However this new user is a (presumed) good faith sock of Inspiringflow, to whom JBW has made a strong suggestion that they desist. I've moved the article back to Draft, warned both about UPE, and left each {{uw-agf-sock}} although this feels more deliberate than that template warrants.

There is discussion on my user talk page about the editor and the article/draft. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. I looked at your talk page and don't think I need to comment any, seems like good advice has been given all around. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember when I last used AWB/JWB, and don't foresee myself requiring its use in the future. I'm not sure why I asked for AWB access first place. No point in having access, as such. Thanks! JavaHurricane 21:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]