Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/06

All files' author is provided as unknown, which is insufficient, because they are mostly not historical. Real author and confirmation via VTRS is needed. The b/w historical photo is taken from this website.

• File:Památkově chráněné schodiště před rekonstrukcí - budova B.jpg
• File:Fasáda po rekonstrukci - budova A.jpg
• File:Fasáda po rekonstrukci - budova A (cropped).jpg
• File:Historická fotografie - budova B (uprostřed).jpg
• File:Nový skleněný světlík dle návrhu ing.arch. Martina Náhlovského - budova B.jpg
• File:Fasáda po rekonstrukci - budova B.jpg
• File:Historická fotografie - budova A.jpg
• File:Původní světlík bez prosklení - budova B.jpg
• File:Fasáda před rekonstrukcí - budova A.jpg

– Gumruch (talk) 00:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This sound recording might be openly licensed, but the song it is a recording of is still copyrighted under R173947. The recording as a derivative work should be deleted until January 1, 2025. SDudley (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion here for more info. To summarize; the user is from Vienna where the song is public domain, and thus they are free to record it. However, since it is an American work there is a different rule to follow. SDudley (talk) 03:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOYS Quote:Indeed, some countries, such as Japan,[10] generally consider toys to be utilitarian objects and therefore ineligible for copyright. I think this applies in this case.Smiley.toerist (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However, the US doesn't consider toys to be utilitarian object and they are protected by copyright, even the toy is copyright-free in the source country. On Commons, object need to be copyright-free in both the source country and the US. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are these toys or just dolls? Not all dolls are toys. The voodoo dolls serve a more sinister purpose. These dolls are not being played only displayed with names. There is certainly trademark protection on some figures, such as mickey mouse doll. I dont know if the dolls are knownin the Japanese context. The copyrigth is marginal at best and in those cases I would only look at the Japanese laws.Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to google lens the rigth hand figure but I could not any name or manufacturer:

https://lens.google.com/search?ep=subb&hl=nl&re=df&p=AbrfA8pakESJRBlIfitRJayP-u5EiSKmpZboZMNNSJO-B4Y96YoeGWpmg1AGrZ0addYWfSnv30Ktd-l_nKugye8spNHdOe_9Ny52s1m5piVPXg8Fwfz5YhEUuBkpI33sdBFo8nXVTl1YhCFJ0JA6cEXCxKTJi7-1aUDlmuwRiDEOmQY-9vsssb15m1ak21NjbxjONU9ZNbp0H5hNBQ%3D%3D#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKRFkxWldJeE4yRTNMVE15TTJVdE5HVXdNUzA1WWpFMExUazBaVFF6WVRaaE1tTmlOUklmUVY5NU9HMVJXR05oVUUxVVRVbG5SM0JuU1V4dVVERkpUV3hwTlVSU2F3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsbnVsbCxbbnVsbCxudWxsLFs0NzQyMiwyNjU5Niw0NzA2NiwyMTUwMV1dLG51bGwsWyIxNTQ0OTczZC1jZmVkLTQ4YWMtYmY2NS0yN2E5NjBhZjJiMjMiXV0= Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Also File:Apr6 Woman of the Day (cropped).png

The photograph is copyrighted. Refer to en: Leonora Carrington Tbhotch™ 03:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No argument for the crop - delete (unless she looks less that 30 in which case it may be over 70 years old with not known author. ) The photo here is Carrington with her 1948 painting. I think that is likely to be free to use if the painting is cropped out. Victuallers (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have used a different screen shot to replace Carrington in the "woman of the day". According to commons this image is free to use. Victuallers (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image must be deleted because, although it is a cropped version of a full-body photograph, it has been edited using artificial intelligence. This is evident in the details of the eyes, lips, and especially in the chest tattoo. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CarlosEduardoPA  Keep That is not reason enough to delete the image. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is, as specified in COM:OW. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a policy for "overwriting files". No file is being overwritten here, it is a different file. Günther Frager (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image must be deleted because, although it is a cropped version of a full-body photograph, it has been edited using artificial intelligence. This is evident in the details of the eyes, lips, and especially in the chest tattoo. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 06:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CarlosEduardoPA  Keep Images by artificial intelligence are not prohibited on Wikimedia Commons. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, yes it is, as specified in COM:OW. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reopenend regular DR, as my decision was contested. Ellywa (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From speedy deletion request by Quick1984 Taken from the web, where available since 2008: tineye. Ellywa (talk) 06:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File description claims that the photo on the poster is also free - Gabuxae (talk) 07:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Any evidence that support the claim? --A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VRT on the image page - Gabuxae (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploaded by the serial copyright violator. Probably taken from a video at [2]. 188.123.231.68 07:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has confessed that it was not his work: [3]. --188.123.231.68 16:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ticket:2024071010007407 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 2600:1002:B0C1:E339:DD02:819C:E68F:234B as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: What is this?  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 103.230.105.27 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation non free logo  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused low quality crop, redundant to File:Victoria Starmer at Number 10 Downing St in 2024 (cropped).jpeg 0x0a (talk) 08:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This says that copyright has expired because it is pre-1929, which I find rather doubtful. Also, just because the photo was provided by the subject, doesn't mean there is no persisting copyright. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © MIKE AUERBACH - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can clearly scratch the "possible" and say "blatant" instead. --2003:C0:8F44:6D00:A402:7493:7D71:2E40 14:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Mike Auerbach allowed officially to use the file. What proof is needed? Sonja Summer (talk) 10:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it best, when Mike Auerbach writes his permission direct to permissions-commons@wikipedia.org?or here? Sonja Summer (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jakob Stolz is the owner of the copyright of the Gustaf Willnauer foto - not Mike Auerbach. That is wrong. Jakob Stolz will send permission to permissions-commons@wikipedia.org Sonja Summer (talk) 11:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is wrong. Jakob Stolz is the fotographer, not Auerbach. Sonja Summer (talk) 11:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ticket:2024071010003321 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These illustrations by America artist Herbert Herget appeared in National Geographic Magazine vol. 73(2), published in the United States in 1938. The usage of {{PD-old-70}} cannot be used for US publications, but determined if the copyright symbol and renewal were applied. In this particular case all the formalities are met: Below each of these paintings there is the inscription "© National Geographic Society" [4]; and the copyright of the magazine was renewed in 1966 [5]. We can delete it in 2034 when it enters in the public domain in its country of origin.

• File:Herbert M. Herget, A giant serpent of many-colored rope is borne by a wildly snakedancing throng through the holy square of Cuzco.jpg
• File:Herbert M. Herget, Aloof and lordly as the snow peaks of the Andes, an Inca prince rides toward Cuzco on the shoulders of his men.jpg
• File:Herbert M. Herget, Give us, o sun, thy pure and sacred fire.jpg
• File:Herbert M. Herget, Relays of swift post-runners linked the Empire.jpg
• File:Herbert M. Herget, Up Temple steps at Pachacamac a High Priest bears the Sun's golden image.jpg
• File:Tributes to the Inca are carried on the back of llamas.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of flag that is presumably copyrighted Dronebogus (talk) 10:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this photo was taken at The Dalles city hall. 2600:100F:B1A5:DB07:8D30:28FB:5B66:25F 18:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, that doesn’t mean anything Dronebogus (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Local emblems are not covered by government copyright exemption outside of Florida and California Dronebogus (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has made a large number of valuable contributions to Commons. However, a very small portion of them seem to be out of scope: personal artwork, digitally simulated kaleidoscopes, and vaguely identified whirlpools, none of which really adds anything to their respective topics. All unused, except by bots in some cases. Sinigh (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Artistic Effect Grass.jpg
• File:Artistic Effect Grass 3.jpg
• File:Dramatic filtered Image of Trees and Sky.jpg
• File:Rock Wall Kaleidoscope Pattern.jpg
• File:Rock Wall Kaleidoscope Pattern 2.jpg
• File:Vermont Fall Colours.jpg
• File:Whirlpool 6152.jpg
• File:Whirlpool 6155.jpg

Sinigh (talk) 11:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm easy, really! I included them because it seemed to me that there would be a community need for a few free quality artisitc pieces of that sort. However, if they are considered clutter and are not being drawn upon, then I will certainly not be offended if they are deleted.

By the way, how do I find out if my images are being downloaded / used? I assumed there was such a feature but have been too busy to pursue. Paul Harrison (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information about file usage on Commons and other projects is automatically added to the file page. See for example the lists below this image: File:Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 08.jpg. As for downloads, I don't know how to find that information or if it's even possible. Sinigh (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This timeline image has a tag named "Fan", and a person named Simon Hury is named there, which makes it seem like that Hury is part of the band. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 11:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The usage of {{PD-Italy}} is incorrect. This photo was taken by Giancarlo Botti in Paris while working for the French photo Agency Gamma (see metadata). Botti moved to Paris in 1958 and died in Antibes in 2008 [6]. Thus, the country of origin is France and it is still copyrighted. We can undelete it in 2079 Günther Frager (talk) 11:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The country of origin of this photography is France and not Italy. It may seem odd because Loris Azzaro is Italian and the photographer Giancarlo Botti is also Italian. However, Azzaro lived from 1962 until his death in Paris [7]. Similarly, Botti moved to Paris in 1958 and worked for the French photo agency Gamma and died in Antibes in 2008 [8]. We can undelete it in 2078. Günther Frager (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Фото со странице в фейсбуке, лицензия ложная. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=427366421174032&set=pb.100066941438275.-2207520000 -- Tomasina (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really an own work? 186.175.2.120 12:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because I took the picture myself. Caorongjin (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Why doesn't it have Exif like your other photos? 186.175.2.120 14:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a screen grab from a video I recorded. Besides, missing Exif shouldn't be the basis for nomination. Caorongjin (talk) 13:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author stated in matedata: Aaron Kum. Uploader: Michael Bergman. Confirmation of the license via VTRS is needed. Gumruch (talk) 12:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Italian actress Virna Lisi by Canadian photographer Douglas Kirkland. The source is the Lisi' webpage, but it is not clear the country of origin is Italy because Kirkland worked in Hollywood and Virna Lisi also. Without a proper origin information of this image we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

URV - Genehmigung des Fotografen fehlt. Laut Metadaten ist das Carlos Pablo Contreras und nicht der Uploader Barbasca (talk) 12:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin der Photograph und habe es genehmigt. Wenn du einen BLick auf meine User-Site wirfst, findest du da mein Flickr-Profil und dort ein weiteres Bild von Harald Lesch aus der Fotoserie. Keine Ahnung, wer Carlos ist. Wahrscheinlich war er der Vorbesitzer der gebrauchten X-H1, die ich für das Foto genutzt habe. Photo MF (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verstehe, aber leider hat die Angabe eines anderen Fotografennamens meine Zweifel geweckt. Das kommt ja leider nicht so selten vor, dass Leute hier angeben, sie hätten selbst fotografiert, auch wenn das nicht zutrifft. Ich denke, es wäre gut, wenn du Herrn Contreras für zukünftige Fotos aus den Metadaten entfernen könntest. Hier kommt sicherlich bald ein Admin vorbei, der sich das anschaut und dann entscheidet. Gruß Barbasca (talk) 22:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos war tatsächlich der Vorbesitzer der Kamera. Der Metadaten-Marker übersteht scheinbar seit einer gewissen Fuji-Firmware-Version einen Reset der Kamera. It's a feature, not a bug ... offenbar. Jetzt ist er raus.

Dass deine Zweifel geweckt wurden, verstehe ich. Aber du solltest vlt. nicht gleich zu einer "Genehmigung des Fotografen fehlt"-Feststellung kommen. Denn auf solche Einträge in den Exif-Daten ist, wie ich aus anderen Fällen sagen kann, nicht unbedingt Verlass. Fotografen tauschen Kameras oft aus oder tauschen sie als Arbeitsgerät mit anderen, in Redaktionen werden Kameras als Leihstellungen vergeben etc. pp.

Dass sich in den Fotos eines Fotografen daher die Namen anderer oder jene von Firmen oder Redaktionen finden ist nicht selten. Photo MF (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ich werde in Zukunft ggf. vorsichtiger fomulieren. Gruß Barbasca (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are not "simple" photographs as described in {{PD-Italy}} because they are stagged and García is clearly posing for the camera. The copyright protection of these kind of images is 70 years pma.

• File:Andres García, c. 1970s.jpg
• File:Andrés García in the 1980s (cropped).jpg
• File:Andrés García in the 1980s, 2.jpg
• File:Andrés García in the 1980s.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 13:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of the non-free poster ru:Родина-мать зовёт!, the author died in 1985. Quick1984 (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Equatorial Guinea.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is marked as being under CC0, however the source image isn't from a government website where CC0 orOGL would be automatically applied, but from daily record. The permission section talks about "National Archives UK Government Web Archive", which is fine except again the link isn't to the National Archives, it's to a newspaper. There's certainly no evidence when searching the web archive for Blair in 1997.

I added a permission needed in hopes somebody would find an actual link to the government website where this is allegedly from, Mewhen123, then changed the licence to OGL2 and removed No permission tag , only saying Permission not needed, under ogl, which dosn't solve anything because the question was where it was ever released under CC0/OGL2/OGL3 or anything else, infomation that Mewhen123 failed to provide Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 14:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo published in Italy n 1995. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention. At this point, the upload of such photos has been widely accepted. The reasoning cannot stop at merely deleting the single photo; we need to have a broader discussion, especially considering that this photo was not published in the United States of America. Vale93b (talk) 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Italy and the US are members of the Berne Convention. That means that anything published in Italy is automatically copyrighted in the US. The copyright in Italy for simple photographs is 20 years after creation, while the US is 70 years pma. Notice that the US doesn't implement the rule of the shorter term. @Vale93b: the licensing policy is quite clear: images needs to be in the public domain in both the country of origin and the US. I don't know where you got it was accepted to upload photos that are obviously copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Günther Frager Category:Works_copyrighted_in_the_U.S. Vale93b (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vale93b: that is a special category that contains the images uploaded before March 1, 2012 and had their US copyright restored in 1996 due to URAA. That is because Commons ignored URAA restored files, but changed its posture after the US Supreme Court stated URAA restorations were constitutional. Instead of mass deletion the files were tagged using {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Notice that it cannot be used for new uploads. The file in this DR has not its US copyright restored by URAA, and if it were, the tag couldn't be applied as you uploaded in 2022. Günther Frager (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Singh At Kharar Punjab CHD University.jpg
• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Singh At Shimla 6.jpg
• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Singh At New Shimla Gurudwara.jpg
• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Singh At Shimla.jpg
• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Sikh.jpg
• File:Charanjeet Singh Khalsa Singh At Shimla 2.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming the uploader is indeed Leopoldo Freyrie, he does not appear to be the one who took the portrait of him. Assuming the uploader is not Freyrie, they don't own the architectural images, which may also be owned by the company Invimit (source). Suggest delete.

• File:Leopoldo Freyrie.jpg
• File:Vista della futura Piazza d'Armi.jpg
• File:Volo 2.jpg

Sinigh (talk) 15:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

• File:Voxbox 1200.png
• File:Teleauditooriumi mõõdikuuringu seade.png

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused images of university rankings with no source for the rankings (personal preference?).

• File:Ranking de las tres mejores Universidades de Bolivia .jpg
• File:Ranking de las mejores Universidades de Santa Cruz .png

Omphalographer (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused abstract artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is unused, but this may be useful in the future as an example of "vector illustration made in the year 2002 using Macromedia Flash". 1904.CC (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused abstract artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image may be used some time in the future to illustrate a style of graphic design collage of early 2000s. There exists a Category:Abstract paintings, so how is abstract artwork out of scope? 1904.CC (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That use seems fairly implausible. Articles about artwork typically focus on works by notable artists. More generally, categories like Category:Abstract paintings exist to categorize artwork which is already in scope on Commons, primarily pieces by notable artists. The existence of categories for types of artwork doesn't mean that all artwork of those genres is in scope, no more than categories like Category:Selfies mean that all selfies are in scope. Omphalographer (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. I think we disagree on the scope of Commons. There is no requirement of notability regarding the artists or authors of images, as long as the images are "realistically useful for an educational purpose". As you say, "Articles about artwork typically focus on works by notable artists". This is correct for areas were public domain images are available. But articles on contemporary design are difficult to illustrate with designs by notable contemporary artists or designers, since those tend to be protected by copyright. Therefore, samples of contemporary graphic design published under creative-commons licences, even by non-notable designers, can be useful and serve an educational purpose. For exemple, if you look at category:Web design, you see that there isn't a great amount of content. 1904.CC (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph created by renowned Bolivian photographer Freddy Alborta (1932-2005) in 1971. They are currently in the public domain in its country of origin (50 years after creation), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, they are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep these images.

• File:51 - Hugo Banzer (CROPPED).jpg
• File:51 - Hugo Banzer (CROPPED2).jpg
• File:51 - Hugo Banzer (CROPPED3).jpg
• File:51 - Hugo Banzer.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copvyio: PDF file from a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Хочу свою работу старую удалить,я надеюсь номинирован не единственный способ. Sazhik99 (talk) 17:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Хочу свою работу старую удалить,я надеюсь номинирован не единственный способ. Sazhik99 (talk) 17:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No educational value, cartoon heads most likely copyright protected. Andel (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused flowcharts probably related to the abandoned draft en:Draft:A Prospective Medical System of the Future /A complete health care system. Not useful outside that context.

• File:A complete health care system . Studies and ADRs reporting process flowchart.jpg
• File:A complete health care system a demonstrate example.jpg
• File:A complete health care system Flowchart.jpg

Omphalographer (talk) 17:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused diagrams, probably from a school assignment (with one image including the uploader's name and class number).

• File:CHIMARRO ANA 4.png
• File:FAUSTO GRANDA VENT,SEM.jpg

Omphalographer (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers published in Argentina in the 1980s. They are currently copyrighted in its country of origin (25 years after publicatoin), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, they are still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this images.

• File:Baglietto 1983 tapa.jpg
• File:Baglietto garre.jpg
• File:Baglietto mami.jpg
• File:Baglietto modeloparaarmar.jpg
• File:Baglietto tiempos dificiles.jpg
• File:Baglietto ycompania.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: personal artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 17:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused screenshots of text.

• File:Comunidades Organizadas.png
• File:Mesas Técnicas de Agua.png

Omphalographer (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused Venn diagram, unlikely to be useful outside its original context. Omphalographer (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused image of a Greek flag with overlaid artwork and text; not sure what this is but it doesn't look useful. Omphalographer (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused semi-promotional images ranking (European) football teams. Not likely to be useful, especially since they're six years out of date now.

• File:Los 4 primeros del Fútbol Sala.jpg
• File:Top 5 LSFS.jpg

Omphalographer (talk) 17:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Côte D'Ivoire unfortunately does not have freedom of panorama (COM:FOP Ivory Coast), the building(s) are copyrighted by their architect therefore the photos are not free. See previous DRs.

• File:BaseliqueCiv 01.jpg
• File:BaseliqueCiv 02.jpg
• File:Basilique de Yamoussoukro - dalle.jpg
• File:Basilique de Yamoussoukro 2.jpg
• File:La Basolique notre Dame de la Paix de Yamoussoukro (Bosson).jpg
• File:La fondation notre Dame de la Paix de Yamoussoukro (Bosson).jpg
• File:View from the top of the largest basilica in the world.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 11.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 12.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 13.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 14.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 15.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 16.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 21.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 22.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 23.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 24.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 25.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 30.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 31.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 32.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 33.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 34.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 35.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 36.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 37.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 38.jpg
• File:WikiConvFr23 à Abidjan en cote d'Ivoir- viste sur Basilique de Yamoussoukro 39.jpg

Consigned (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused abstract artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused pencil drawings of distinctly unattractive people.

• File:Two tribe iors.png
• File:Ior.png

Omphalographer (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo published in the Argentine magazine El Gráfico in 1991. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo published in Argentine magazine Gente in 1991. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poster for a 1956 Spanish film. Not public domain, and Flickr user is not the copyright holder. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo published in Argentine magazine El Gráfico in 1991. Still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albums published in Argentina during the 1980s. The covers are currently in the public domain in its country of origin (25 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA time. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep these images.

• File:Fabianacantilo detectives.jpg
• File:Fabianacantilo perros calientes.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

extremely blurry, not used Mateus2019 (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very bad quality Mateus2019 (talk) 19:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an incorrect flag. The correct one is Flag of Zalla.svg, inverted 88.11.133.59 19:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ver: https://ca.wikiloc.com/rutes-senderisme/pv163-gordexola-pr-123-alto-de-rigadas-zalla-72994457, https://www.galdames.org/es-ES/Turismo/Lugares-Interes/Paginas/Encartaciones-Zalla.aspx, https://www.eusko-ikaskuntza.eus/es/fondo-documental/fondo-multimedia/mu-59766/#, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=698059499019708&set=ecnf.100063803530455, https://www.deia.eus/politica/2020/04/14/pp-pide-poner-bandera-espanola-4712534.html. Todos ellos muestran que la bandera ondeante tiene blanco arriba. Esta imagen sale la segunda en búsquedas de bandera de Zalla y genera confusión. UnniMan (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, already available on the web in 2012 [9] That is, 4 years before it was uploaded to Commons. Günther Frager (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an incorrect flag. The correct one is Flag of Zalla.svg, inverted 88.11.133.59 19:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ver: https://ca.wikiloc.com/rutes-senderisme/pv163-gordexola-pr-123-alto-de-rigadas-zalla-72994457, https://www.galdames.org/es-ES/Turismo/Lugares-Interes/Paginas/Encartaciones-Zalla.aspx, https://www.eusko-ikaskuntza.eus/es/fondo-documental/fondo-multimedia/mu-59766/#, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=698059499019708&set=ecnf.100063803530455, https://www.deia.eus/politica/2020/04/14/pp-pide-poner-bandera-espanola-4712534.html. Todos ellos muestran que la bandera ondeante tiene blanco arriba. UnniMan (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely own work. The photos are clearly taken by profesional photographers. Some images are really small, other too large. And what prompted me to start this DR: the author of File:Denys Collomb de Daunant.jpg is actually Jean-Claude Marmara [10].

• File:Léo Ferré à Mèze 1984 face à Brassens.jpg
• File:Brel Tournage de l'Emmerdeur 1973.jpg
• File:Yves Piétrasanta février 2001.jpg
• File:Yves Piétrasanta février 2001 (cropped).jpg
• File:Denys Collomb de Daunant.jpg
• File:Tournage de l'Emmerdeur, 1972.jpg
• File:JACQUES TATI CANNES 1976.jpg
• File:Marie-Hélène Breillat.jpg
• File:Édouard Molinaro 1973.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Le fichier Denys Collomb de Daunant.jpg n'est pas de moi c'est le fils de Denys Collomb de Daunant, qui m'a demandé de mettre cette image en ligne et comme c'est assez compliqué et que j'avais un compte, j'ai simplifié. Je pensais d'ailleurs que cette image était de son fils Florian. Mais puisque l'auteur s'est identifié il est naturel de le créditer et de retirer mon nom. Je suis désolé du désagrément bien involontaire. En ce qui concerne les autres photos elles sont bien de moi. Passez voir les négatifs à la maison quand vous voulez. Bien cordialement. Manuperez 2A01:CB1D:8084:8F00:E4A5:C8CF:D9E0:4AE9 09:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are indeed the photographer of the other photos, then please send an explicit permission to COM:VRT. Günther Frager (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep Per Manuperez. - Groupir ! (talk) 14:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Groupir !: that is an IP address, it could be Manuperez or a dog. Günther Frager (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Don't be patronising every single time. Groupir ! (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meta Data has wrong info, need to delete it and reupload correctly Inah xrem (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per source page and metadata, this image is on a non-commercial licence not allowing derivative works. 2A0A:EF40:D7F:1901:BD30:216:1C70:141D 20:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer Official Portrait (cropped).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Official portrait of Liz Truss.jpg - Wikimedia Commons, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liz Truss official portrait (cropped)2.jpg - Wikimedia Commons, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheikh Hasina with David Cameron.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kaleb Cooper.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boris Johnson hosts virtual G7 meeting (1).jpg, etc., etc. As the about page and very metadata to which nom refers reads All images are Crown copyright and re-usable under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/Pictures. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 21:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Discussed many times before and consensus is that the OGL statement is accepted. The multi-licensing template is, in fact, present on the file page already. S5A-0043^Talk|

Screenshots of Fellini Satyricon premiered in Italy in 1969. However, it was registered in the US in 1970 with register number LF0000000059 [11] and renewed in 1996 with registration number RE0000725205 [12]. Thus the usage of {{PD-1996}} is incorrect and the images cannot be kept. We can undelete tham in 2065 when the film enters in the US public domain.

• File:Fellini-Satyricon.jpg
• File:Fellini-Satyricon1.jpg
• File:Fellini-Satyricon2.jpg
• File:Fellini-Satyricon3.jpg
• File:Fellini-Satyricon4.jpg
• File:Fellini-Satyricon5.jpg

Günther Frager (talk) 21:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate: File:Nietzsche1882.jpg Geohakkeri (talk) 21:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional content, please read COM:SCOPE

• File:Mapa provincial de Riberna - ficticio.png
• File:Mapa municipal de Navarra - ficticio.png
• File:Mapa municipal de Riberna - ficticio.png
• File:Mapa provincial Navarra - ficticio.png

Ⳑ (talk) 21:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irene must be a woman? 186.173.130.154 22:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the scope? The cup is cupyrighted. 186.173.130.154 22:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My files, COM:NOTUSED; McCoy's file had been used in an article I wrote that I later redirected and the other is for a bassist that doesn't have any articles on any wiki. I previously tagged it as G7, but Billinghurst reverted it.

Takao Oshima signature bass.svg is a derivative work of File:Takao Oshima signature.svg, which was deleted by G7.

• File:Joey McCoy signature.svg
• File:Takao Oshima signature bass.svg

reppop^talk 22:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File con elementi tridimensionali nella cornice, non in pubblico dominio Carlo Dominioni (talk) 22:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: screenshots probably intended for an internal training manual. Not useful to the general public.

• File:CrazyDomainLogIn.png
• File:Figure 1 Ops Directory Structure.jpg
• File:Figure 1 Operational Directory Structure.png

Omphalographer (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused, unidentified web page screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]