Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/16

Nonsense creation. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 03:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted – vandalism. --jdx ^Re: 06:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

test creation. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 03:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted – vandalism. --jdx ^Re: 06:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use image:Non-free television screenshot Yann (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Fair use image:Non-free television screenshot Yann (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More information is required as to copyright status. If it is Open Street Map, it needs to be attributed as such. Американский папаша (talk) 09:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Base map from OpenStreetMap, I have modified the summary section, so please close the discussion. Thanks. - Eugen Simion 14 (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now attributed properly. --Sealle (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

porque no es especifico 201.160.216.106 10:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Non-sense DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

The individual expression of thought required for protection is present because the photograph is given an individual character by the choice of framing. 178.197.232.248 22:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It cannot be excluded that this is an art photograph despite the bad scan quality 178.197.225.189 19:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, the license seems correct. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:Taivo. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong licence, no obvious case: I disagree about the individuality of the picture. 178.197.226.251 11:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy close: no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid PD template: no evidence for publication as it originated from a private photograph album. Photos kept in a private albut are a classic case of unpublished photos. Ankry (talk) 23:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the 2017 DR was related to the {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} template which is no longer valid. So arguments provided there are irrelevant here. Ankry (talk) 23:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep At that time only professional photographers owned a camera, and the photographer giving it to someone else constituted publication. We already have had this discussion. Yann (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1993/1798_1798_1798/en#art_31 "1 Where the author of a work is unknown, protection for that work expires 70 years after it has been published..."

even if it was unpublished, to whom does the protection of copyright belong to? author is anonymous, so the owner of the photo can publish it, right? in this case the uploader published it here on commons.

(otherwise, if even the owner of an anonymous photo is not allowed to publish it, then the photo is locked forever?) RZuo (talk) 10:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann. --Bedivere (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright infridgement hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 12:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No exif and low quality. I don't think that is an own work. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• English isn't understood.

* The one of which I took a picture.(This was also used by my blog once, but.) just in case, it's replaced with a different picture.--Bject (talk) 11:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by SaaraToyssy as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|regtrademark=yes Yann (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Il s'agit d'une page créée par erreur, une catégorie a été créée et la remplace Emeltet (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COM:COPYVIO Same size image at http://mucahitkucukyilmaz.com/kimdir, older than this upload. Source page is copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mücahit Küçükyılmaz.jpg: COM:COPYVIO Same size image at http://mucahitkucukyilmaz.com/kimdir, older than this upload. Source page is copyright.

protected logo of Hans Huber 178.197.226.216 21:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: logo is de-minimis, in my opinion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The manuscript surpasses threshold of originality 178.197.232.122 20:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: reopened DR without new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two images on the source flickr account. Is the source trustworthy? Leoboudv (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Hystrix: Copyright violation: From Twitter, no EXIF Data

There are only two images on the source flickr account. Is the source trustworthy? Leoboudv (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: The uploader had one image deleted on his talkpage already with a similar sounding title. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by Hystrix due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted via discussion in October 2011 and November 2016. Out of project scope. — ξ^xplicit 01:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Previously published, such as at https://alchetron.com/Ankush-Hazra-606533-W#- and no evidence that uploader could legitimately claim as own work David Biddulph (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: professional shot with weird name, no EXIF data. Yann (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's found in bigger size at http://www.events72.ru/persona/artem-androsov-seychas-luchshe-smotret-v-storonu-it-tehnologiy. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted several times from March 2011 to December 2012 due to copyright, notability, and spam concerns. Out of project scope.

• File:120 HOURS logo.png
• File:IMG 8796-4.jpg

— ξ^xplicit 02:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, really 4 times deleted. All depicted people are unmentioned in en.wiki and as well in no.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All images seem copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Possible copyright violations.

• File:Noor Z2.jpg
• File:Mgi logo16.png
• File:Yolanda 3.jpg
• File:Ika Pertiwi2.jpg
• File:Olvah 2.jpg
• File:Dikna 2.jpg

Takeaway (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photos without metadata, different watermarks, one Facebook file, one complex logo, one credited to another entity. Let's not wait more. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks on images, doubtful own work

• File:Kevin Lilliana2.jpg
• File:Dea rizkita2.jpg
• File:Karina Nadila2.jpg
• File:Bunga Jelitha2.jpg
• File:Dea Rizkita.jpg

Slangcamms (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also "FBMD" in meta of 3/5s of the images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright proof – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 05:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Ohlobystin.jpg: same reason

Copyright violation. Non-Free. VK.com is not a free-use source for this photo. ← Alex Great ^talk_rus? 07:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I confirm © all rights reserved per https://vk.com/terms . Taivo (talk) 11:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

practical duplicate of File:רחל שביט-בנטואיץ, חצר משק בזיכרון יעקב.jpg, and unintentionally so. The other one is used in an article, and this one isn't. Ijon (talk) 09:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I agree. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Bild ist von einem dreidimensionalen Objekt, es wurde aber kein Fotograf bzw. Urheber angeführt. Die angegebene Lizenz PD-100 ist nicht möglich. Es geht um die Urheberschaft am Bild und nicht an der Vase! Hubertl 22:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rijksmuseum napisało na tej stronie bardzo wyraźnie, że plik (zdjęcie) jest w domenie publicznej. Samo naczynie też jest w domenie publicznej—wykonane w latach 1700 do 1720—więc naprawdę nie widzę, w czym tutaj leży problem. odder (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Dutch Rijksmuseum want people to use and modify the images from their website Rijksstudio. Under Dutch law you can wave the moral right regarding giving the photographer credit. And since the Rijksmuseum has employees take the images they do own the copyright and they release the images. There is no obligation by law to give someone employed by you credit. This is a clear keep for me. Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious keep. Read this 2013 article, by the manager of the Rijksstudio project, and then ponder if there is any chance that an image that is marked as in the public domain, and available through Rijksstudio, is the slightest problem for us. It's not. Allowing unrestricted use is the entire point. The {{PD-100}} license is referring to the vase, not the image (which would be PD-author). - Revent^talk 22:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as odder and Natuur12. The Rijksmuseum is in whole Europe very known for this fact, even at the requester. According to odder's disc this is very clearly an action of WP:DWIP. --Stepro (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Und warum gibt es dann keinen Hinweis im Sinne einer OTRS-Erlaubnis? Damit wäre das Problem dauerhaft geklärt. Eine weitere Möglichkeit wäre, wenn man die Bilder - es kommen sicher noch welche dazu - mit einer Vorlage versehen werden, welche auf diesen Umstand hinweist. Die ganze Angelegenheit mit über 120.000 möglichen Bildern ist sicher wert, dass man das ordentlich macht. Der normale Commons-User, der mit der Sache nicht persönlich vertraut ist, wird ohne diesen Hinweis auf dasselbe Ergebnis kommen wie ich. Kein dreidimensionales Bild kann Urheberechtsfrei und frei für die Weiterverwendung sein, soferne nicht diese Freigabe durch den uneingeschränkten Rechteinhaber klar ersichtlich gemacht wird. Und dreh nicht gleich durch, Stepro, du könntest vom Sessel fallen! Hat dich übrigens wer angepingt, weil du gar so schnell da warst? Eine neue Erkenntnis kam ja nicht von Dir. --Hubertl 22:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User Hubertl is right in saying that the image was unjustly released under the {{PD-old-100}} license. This should be {{Cc-zero}}. See also https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/en/api/terms-and-conditions-of-use. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent Steenberg: The API terms are not relevant, since Commons is not using the API. - Revent^talk 07:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that matters. Article 5 in these terms says: "All data and all images made available through the API are either in the public domain or are subject to a CC0 license. The data and images are royalty-free and may be copied, distributed, modified and used without the permission of the Rijksmuseum." Most files in Category:Images from the Rijksmuseum were uploaded using a {{Cc-zero}} license. See also Commons:Batch uploading/Rijksmuseum. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: spurious nomination by Hubertl - a repeat of this disruption will result in sanctions. --Nick (talk) 12:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photos of non-notable people, out of scope

• File:Kalopin.jpg
• File:Copiah Tribe.jpeg
• File:Cast of season 1.jpg

Mjrmtg (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope; not useful for educational purposes.

• File:Underground - Clothing.jpg
• File:Underground - Accessories.jpg
• File:Underground - Sonik.jpg
• File:HALFMOON LOGO.jpg
• File:UNDERGROUND LOGO.jpg
• File:Underground - Steel Cap.jpg
• File:Underground - Winklepicker.jpg
• File:Underground - Nox.jpg
• File:Underground - Jungle.jpg
• File:Underground - Creepers.jpg

MCMLXXXIX 01:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete logos due to non-notability. I'm not sure about boots. One boot is worse than pair and quality is not excellent, so I'm leaning to weak delete. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as not notable in December 2011. Out of project scope. Additionally, the photos of the buildings cite 'zars.ua' as the source; the relationship between the site and the uploader is unclear, so there may be an issue with permission as well.

• File:Francuzskiy-35.jpg
• File:Kirpichniy-9.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-7.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-6a.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-3-1.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-6.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-4.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-4a.jpg
• File:Dovzhenko-2.jpg
• File:Tablichka-zars.jpg
• File:Founder.png
• File:Zars-logo-wiki-en.png
• File:Zars-logo-wiki-ru.png
• File:Zars-logo-wiki-ua.png

— ξ^xplicit 03:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Buildings are modern and there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Logos are complex and need OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User's only uploads are these 18 personal photos that are on their user page, all unused besides that and out of scope. Commons is not a photo gallery.

• File:Kadir Avcıv.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıb.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcım.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıj.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıu.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıd.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıqg.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıq.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcır.jpg
• File:Kadirr Avcı.jpg
• File:Kadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir Avcı.jpg
• File:Kadir AvcıKadir Avcıb.jpg
• File:Kadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir Avcı.jpg
• File:Kadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir AvcıKadir Avcı.jpg
• File:Kadir AvcıKadir Avcı.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcııııı.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıııı.jpg
• File:Kadir Avcıı.jpg

Mjrmtg (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why should it be deleted 86.162.130.242 23:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Why should be kept? Vandalism maybe?. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

old personal private photo --Alaa Najjar :)..! 10:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that the uploader holds the copyright over the logo, such copyrights are usually held by groups. And the logo looks sufficiently complex and stylized that it would be copyrightable too. Also, if this is deleted, the shadowscommons tag on en:File:Winx Club Logo.png should be removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No source, no description, no evidence of license. Given the nature of the subject, this is definitely a copyright violation. —Codename Lisa (talk) 12:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A user image uploaded to Commons for hosting purposes only. Contains self-promotional material. Violates COM:SCOPE. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 22:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same image in category (file:Symettry.jpg) BluesyPete (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, duplicate. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a registered trademark and can't therefore be released into the public domain and has to be deleted. Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, trademark or not, that's not important. The file is correctly marked as textlogo. For example, Commons has logos of Microsoft, Audi, Volkswagen and so on – all trademarked. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This symbol is from the 20th century, see en:Khanda (Sikh symbol). No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. We have no indication that the copyright on this image would have expired. Jcb (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While I can't find any direct evidence to the contrary, the symbol is included in Unicode (U+262C) since 1993, as well as many fonts. I don't believe either the Unicode consortium nor the font publishers would have included it had there been any question of its copyright status. If such a strict interpretation is the norm, I support deletion. Ktims (talk) 03:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The symbol is so widespread that I cannot imagine anyone having a copyright on it. It is used like a Hindu svastika or a Christian cross… --Superbenjamin (talk) 10:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Unicode (U+262C) symbol is different. Jcb (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Speedy keep: Disruptive and ridiculous nomination. Just a free variant of an (not too) old symbol. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous nomination, no valid reason for speedy closure. You cannot base a premature closure on a random nonsense rant of Amitie 10g. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nor Amitie 10g, neither Yann, has used a single word to explain why this would be a "free variant of an (not too) old symbol". Jcb (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - identical File:Khanda.jpg has been deleted in the meantime for possible copyright issues - Jcb (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jcb's statement isn't even true. It was deleted because it was not used. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the deletion log. I know you disagree with the given deletion reason, but Jim did not revoke it when you complained about it at his user talk page. Jcb (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is an SVG drawn by a known Commons contributor, so the license for this particular representation of the symbol should not be in doubt. It is stated to be a DW of the Unicode version, which is PD. So, I don't see where the copyright concern arises. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is: I did look at the Unicode version, but it's quite different from this version, while 'Traced from scavenged bitmap', as stated in the upload log, also indicates that this is a DW, but not from the Unicode version. Jcb (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Close enough to the original (from unicode.org) for not having a new copyright. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own works, last remaining files.

• File:Arjun Munda excm jharkhand.jpg
• File:Arjun Munda Jharkhand.png

Yann (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a blatant exaggeration. The subject image is of a 5-layered interchange somewhere in China (as suggested by Google Image Search), but certainly not in Pakistan, since the traffic here is driving on right side, where as traffic in Pakistan drives on left. Thus, this image needs to be deleted immediately from Wikimedia Commons. Ahsaniqbal 93 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Not PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is a symbol hundreds years old. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This symbol is not hundreds of years old, it's from the 20th century, see en:Khanda (Sikh symbol). Closing admin of previous nomination has been contacted, but he did not revise the closure. We have no indication that the copyright on this image would have expired. Jcb (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep obviously. This is even a UTF-8 symbol (see wikt:☬), so there is certainly no copyright on it. I also think that this nomination is disruptive and ridiculous. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khanda.svg. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There is no "author" even for the modern version. It would be anyway PD 60 years after first publication in India if there was a copyright in the first place, which I doubt. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Speedy keep: The original descriptions mentions clearly the source: "US Marines in Vietnam: The Defining Year, 1968". Finding it in Google, the first result is this PDF, when the graphic is found at the page 71 opf the document (page 87 in the PDF). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:KhS6.jpg. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see copyright violation + incorrect "own work" claim. If it really is own work, it would be out-of-scope per personal gallery content. Lordtobi (✉) 17:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, San Andreas Republic is fictional and exists only in universe of Grand Theft Auto. This is not a simple logo and is copyrighted by creators of Grand Theft Auto. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope, spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong PD, artist died 1972 Goesseln (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the file can be restored in 2043 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incorrectly named Mbosanquet (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - personal images. The Goa image is probably used in the id-Wictionary only on the basis of the file name.

• File:Goa.jpg
• File:At Gym.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image, different higher quality versions can be found on the Internet, likely to be a cropped screenshot of some very popular video, then a copyvio, as every other upload of the uploader's. Vituzzu (talk) 20:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, derivative work of video screenshot. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image, different higher quality version can be found on the Internet, likely to be a cropped screenshot of some very popular video, then a copyvio, as every other upload of the uploader's. Vituzzu (talk) 20:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, derivative work od video screenshot. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope as an unused personal image and the own work claim is also questionable Natuur12 (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused image Hystrix (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal images Hystrix (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

дубль имеющегося User 699 (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope.

• File:Jocelin 12342.jpg
• File:Jocelin 1234.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation (logo) Huji (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, watermark "Photo: Mohammad Ahangar". Another watermark "Rozenews.com". Taivo (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope.

• File:Grigorigabrielian2015.jpg
• File:Grigorigabrielian2014.jpg
• File:Grigorigabrielian.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom of the image's source page says "All rights reserved." It says the posters (images) are available "free of charge" but that's not the same thing as "unencumbered by copyright" free. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You probably know more about the copyright laws than I do. I just wanted to share the artwork because I like it. The download page said the artwork was available for personal use.

Speedy delete per nom. MB298 (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May not be own work. COM:DW

• File:Infill combined.jpg
• File:Panel comb1.jpg
• File:Typy 2 infill.jpg
• File:Typy 1 infill.jpg
• File:Sim infill panel.jpg
• File:Mech and topo pic.jpg

MCMLXXXIX 00:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Gobautista (talk · contribs):

• File:Abaca.jpg (800×425, camera Sony C905)
• File:Catanduanes.jpg (800×450)
• File:Catanduanes Athletic Complex.jpg (960×640)
• File:Catandungan Festival.jpg (2048×1366)
• File:Catanduanes State University.jpg (640×427)
• File:Palarong Bicol 2013.jpg (960×640)
• File:Soboc Bay.jpg (720×540)
• File:Soboc Beach.jpg (720×540)
• File:Viga Cargo Cable Car.jpg (720×491)
• File:Viga Catanduanes.jpg (1024×683)
• File:Viga Municipal Hall.jpg (800×572)
• File:Virac Port.jpg (960×641)
• File:Virac Youth Center Mall.jpg (960×426)

Mostly small photos and (with one exception) without metadata, different resolution. Uploader is blocked for copyright violations. I suspect here also copyvio. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are all uploads of Grego Dario (talk · contribs):

• File:Grego Dario.JPG
• File:Grego Dario Sw1.jpg
• File:Grego Dario Sw2.jpg
• File:Grego Dario Sw3.jpg
• File:Grego Dario Wiki.jpg

These files have two problems. At first, Grego Dario isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in pt.wiki, he is out of project scope. At second, uploader is always himself depicted and I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quickbridge (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

• File:Qb plakat1.jpg
• File:Qb plakat2.jpg
• File:Qb prozess.jpg
• File:Plakatklein.jpg
• File:Prozessklein.jpg
• File:Plakatklein1.jpg
• File:Plakatkleinb.jpg
• File:Plakatklein1b.jpg
• File:Prozesskleinb.jpg

Derivative work of multiple photos. Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion, DW with stock images, out of scope.

• File:Productos cremas solares boticas qf.png
• File:Productos corporales boticas qf.png
• File:Productos faciales boticas qf.png
• File:Doctor.jpg
• File:Imagotipo de Boticas Q.F..png
• File:Logo de Boticas Q.F..png

Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, no exif data, various sources - no indication that these pictures have been freely licensed my the copyright holders.

• File:Sahiti with Kosovo.jpg
• File:Muriqi with Kosovo.jpg
• File:Elba with Kosovo.jpg
• File:Brahimi with Grasshopper Club Zürich.jpg
• File:Rexhepi with HJK.jpg
• File:Ismajli with Hajduk Split.jpg
• File:Zeneli with Heerenveen.jpg
• File:Alushi with Nürnberg.jpg
• File:Vojvoda with Kosovo.jpg
• File:Aliti with Slaven Belupo.jpg
• File:Kololli in a match.jpg
• File:Rrahmani as Kosovo national team member.jpg
• File:Pnishi with Grasshopper Club Zürich.jpg
• File:Paqarada with SV Sandhausen.jpg
• File:BunjaKosovo.jpg
• File:Nurković with Kosovo.jpg
• File:Troshupa in Feronikel.jpg

4ing (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Scope - personal images; An image is used on the user talk page

• File:Allah rakha.jpg
• File:Allah. rakha.jpg
• File:Ar123.JPG
• File:Allah Rakha.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal images

• File:Ashish Bisht.jpg
• File:Basant Bhatt.png
• File:Basant Bhatt.JPG

Hystrix (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All images are not used; Many without Exif; Some with watermark: futsalcasa.com

• File:مسابقه دوستانه تیم فوتسال کاشی نیلو- تیم ملی ناشنوایان.jpg
• File:همایش تربیت بدنی وعلوم ورزشی- دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مبارکه.jpg
• File:همایش ملی تربیت بدنی وعلوم ورزشی- دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مبارکه.jpg
• File:سومین همایش ملی تربیت بدنی وعلوم ورزشی- دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مبارکه.jpg
• File:کاشی نیلو.jpg
• File:فینال مسابقات فوتبال المپیاد دانشجویان سراسر کشور.jpg
• File:مسابقه دوستانه القادسیه کویت- کاشی نیلو اصفهان.jpg
• File:مسابقه القادسیه کویت- کاشی نیلو اصفهان.jpg
• File:مسابقات قهرمانی اساتید موسسات سما دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.jpg
• File:تیم گیتی پسند اصفهان.jpg
• File:جشنواره دانشجویان نخبه علمی کشور.jpg
• File:جشنواره فرهنگی ورزشی دانشجویان نخبه علمی کشور.jpg
• File:تیم فوتسال کاشی نیلو اصفهان.jpg
• File:تیم فوتبال گیتی پسند اصفهان.jpg

Hystrix (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haumant (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

• File:Déroulement des musiciens Rome (image 1).JPG
• File:Déroulement du rouleau-portrait de Jean-Marie DROT.pdf
• File:Déroulement du rouleau-portrait de Louis le Brocquy par Jorg Zutter.png (collage)
• File:DEROULEMENT GERARD LONGUET 2010.jpg (author en:Gérard Longuet is still living)
• File:DEROULEMENT JOHN CAGE 1988.jpg
• File:DEROULEMENTTATEGALLERY1994.jpg
• File:Giacometti.png (unknown author, but probably modern)
• File:Le rouleau-portrait et le drap.JPG
• File:Prise photographique de Jacques Attali.png (collage)
• File:RETROSPECTIVE MICHEL HAUMANT.jpg
• File:Rouleau-portait de Louis Le Brocquy.jpg
• File:Rouleau-portrait de Jean d'Ormesson au musée Antoine Lecuyer à Saint-Quentin.jpg
• File:ROULEAU-PORTRAIT DE PIERRE ROSENBERG 2008.jpg (author en:Pierre Rosenberg is still living)

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the art is probably modern. Artist is mostly en:Michel Haumant (still living). OTRS-permission from artists is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining uploads of Nazir Belgarwi (talk · contribs):

• File:Hotel Sousse Palace.jpg (1536×1920)
• File:Hotel Le Royal Hammamet.jpg (720×900)

Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, should be SVG if useful. Yann (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uncertain copyright, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, birth certificates of non-notable persons are usually out of scope. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are all contributions of Hinching (talk · contribs):

• File:Basel-web.svg
• File:BCCM Logo.svg
• File:Nhp.svg
• File:Nhpborneo.svg
• File:Nhp-logo.svg

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

• File:Ebony crushes ivory.jpg
• File:Schoolgirl Pin.jpg
• File:Ebonyfacesittingwiggerboi.jpg
• File:Ebonyfullweightfrank.jpg
• File:Dan (Sharette) Shopping.jpg
• File:Sharette, NYC Drag Queen.jpg
• File:Sharette, Drag Queen.jpg
• File:John Mulholland.jpg

Yann (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Gcutler92 (talk · contribs):

• File:Cutler Family Funeral Directors.jpg
• File:Cutler Family Funeral Directors Logo.jpg

Cutler family is not mentioned in en.wiki. The files are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, PNG, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works, probably screenshots.

• File:ChloeRoseFanPhoto.png
• File:ChloeRoseHellions.png

Yann (talk) 09:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

personality rights - boys - title and description damaging Mjrmtg (talk) 01:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These is no evidence that this uploader has the right to freely license material from this organization. In order to keep these on Commons, an authorized official of the organization must send a free license using OTRS.

• File:Main attractions Poster.jpg
• File:Bedesign.jpg
• File:MechTRIX.jpg

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Norway

• File:Trondheim, Norway - panoramio (21).jpg
• File:Trondheim, Norway - panoramio (22).jpg
• File:Trondheim, Norway - panoramio (23).jpg
• File:Trondheim, Norway - panoramio (24).jpg
• File:Trondheim, Norway - panoramio (25).jpg

4ing (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image (selfie?) of no educational value. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Demon dreaming (talk · contribs):

• File:Wd2ed2ed.jpg (634×951, Facebook file)
• File:Jason McGinn 2014.jpeg (586×840, Facebook file)
• File:Jason 2010 WWP.jpeg (326×512)
• File:Jason 2003.jpeg (413×459)
• File:Jason 2014.jpg (567×1223)

Small promotional photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Japan. Fb noo (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to ja.wikipedia. ja:File:Kome Hyappyo Statues 20051120.jpg --Fb noo (talk) 12:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Japan. Fb noo (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to ja.wikipedia. ja:File:Kobayashi Torasaburo Statue 20051120.jpg --Fb noo (talk) 11:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copyrighted derivative image COM:DW Leoboudv (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted derivative poster image. Only the poster's creator holds the copyright. Leoboudv (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. watermarked MCMLXXXIX 00:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Photos of sculptures are double copyrighted: by sculptor and by photographer. As this is Azteca Maya sculpture, it is free from sculptor's rights due to age. But due to watermark, small size and missing metadata own work is unlikely and OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. watermarked MCMLXXXIX 00:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Photos of sculptures are double copyrighted: by sculptor and by photographer. As this is Azteca Maya sculpture, it is free from sculptor's rights due to age. But due to watermark, small size and missing metadata own work is unlikely and OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope; not useful for educational purposes.

• File:Halfmoon.jpg
• File:8 BERWICKST STORE PHOTO 01.jpg

MCMLXXXIX 01:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete logo, because seems non-notable.  Keep photo, which in my opinion has educational value. I categorized it. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Veeramanohar (talk · contribs):

• File:Icc awards cricketer of the year.jpg (225×225)
• File:Under-19-winning-team.jpg (3000×2384, copyright holder 2012 Ian Hitchcock-ICC)
• File:Wor.jpg (900×605)
• File:Young couples.jpg (700×932, watermark "The indian EXPRESS", security camera shot)

Own work is unlikely, probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are both uploads of Ariyanusman (talk · contribs):

• File:Ariyan Usman picture.jpg
• File:Muhammad waqar haider.jpg

Unused self-called selfies, in my opinion not suitable for stock photos, but out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are all contributions of Kristina kazakovaa (talk · contribs):

• File:KristinaKazakova.jpg
• File:KristinaKazakova1.jpg
• File:KristinaKazakova2.png
• File:KristinaKazakova3.png
• File:KristinaKazakova4.jpg

These photos are incorrectly called selfies. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Bellini (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

• File:Burisma.png (672×378) [1]
• File:BurismaBoardofDirectorsParis2013.jpg (1418×945)
• File:Hunter Biden and Vadym Pozharskyi Burisma.jpg (960×720)
• File:USA Burisma.jpg (800×533) [2]
• File:USUBC Burisma.jpg (2636×2466)
• File:V.Pozharskyi GEF UNIDO.jpg (1280×960)
• File:V.pozharskyi monaco.jpg (1000×668, camera NIKON D610)
• File:Вадим Пожарський на презентації Проекту ГЕФ-ЮНІДО.jpg (1280×960)

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, I found 2 obvious copyvios (see links). Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Anna Frodesiak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source http://www.infotel.co.uk/hotels/negeri-pahang/kuantan/suria-cherating-beach-resort HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 09:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FoP Malaysia: "work permanently situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public", this can not be applied to this bedroom. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful that this is really "own work", considering the size, and unclear if it's a permitted logo in any case. JesseW (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, this is not a simple logo. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Size makes me doubt validity of "own work" JesseW (talk) 07:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, also derivative work of probably copyrighted logo. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Нарушение АП: лицензия указана без оснований -- Tomasina (talk) 09:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Поняла, думаю автор будет не против публикации этого фото, свяжусь с ним. Скажите, какие нужны основания чтобы использовать ее в Википедии?

Подписываться не забывайтесь. Правила оформления разрешений описаны в ru:ВП:ДОБРО. ---- Tomasina (talk) 10:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC) upd: Пожалуйста, проконсультируйтесь ещё на форуме авторских прав, возможно, нужно будет еще и разрешение от художника на картины, которые видны на фото. ---- Tomasina (talk) 10:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо, спасибо! Попробую получить разрешение или заменить фото, на сделанное мною лично.

Автор фотографии (Сергей Ветров) и автор художественных работ в фотографии (Алексей Орловский) отправили письма на адрес permissions-ru@wikimedia.org с согласием на ее публикацию в Википедии. Подскажите, это единственное нарушение, которое может препятствовать помещению страницы в общее пространство?

После проверки тикет OTRS будет помещён на странице изображения, тогда проблема с ним будет решена полностью. К возможности существования статьи это никак относится, там свои проблемы, которые нужно решать. Как и удаление фото не мешало бы существованию статьи в Википедии. ---- Tomasina (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• AnastasiaProkopchuk, прежде всего не забывайте подписываться. По упомянутым Вами письмам — возникли вопросы к лицам, их отправившим. OTRS-агент запросил дополнительную информацию. При этом срок обсуждения запроса на удаление истёк, в случае успешного подтверждения разрешений файл может быть восстановлен позднее. Sealle (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe No FoP in Japan. See also Commons:Freedom of panorama#Japan. For uploder, please provide who/when create the monument. Darklanlan (talk) 13:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, in my opinion this is not a simple monument and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is everywhere without any evidence of a free release. Examples: here, here, here Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• also file:Keeth Tube Loira On.jpg

Out of scope and also the flower crown is likely a derivative work. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I added a photo for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photoshopped? unused - out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Songs, promo photos and logos. No evidence of permission(s).

• File:DJ Mixify ful Photo.jpg
• File:Paris city.wav
• File:Ovni.wav
• File:DJ Mixify ful.jpg
• File:Parissa official.jpg
• File:Parissa official logo for Tee-Shirt.png
• File:Parissa official.png
• File:Parissa Official Logo.png
• File:Parissa Official logo.png
• File:Parissa Official.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki, all out of project scope too. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

• File:قرصنة تحت المجهر.pdf
• File:D9 اسوار العلم - عبد الوهاب السيد.pdf

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.voirfilms.co/images/avatars/10130_18.png.

• File:Klaus (2).png
• File:Patrick Laboyrteaux.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - selfpromotion. Henxter (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• also file:Mehmettttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Per nom.--Rapsar (talk) 08:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I added a photo for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not Facebook. jdx ^Re: 22:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• also file:Grit foto sencillo.png

Possible copyright infringement, see this page Andycyca (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I added a copy for deletion. It was uploaded after creation of the request. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 11:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ucanet (talk · contribs):

• File:Canaima.png (240×132)
• File:Capacitacion.jpg (600×450, camera Sony DSC-W330)
• File:ClassmateIntel.png (750×563)
• File:Conectarigualdad.jpg (390×235)
• File:Equipoucanet.jpg (608×456, camera Sony DSC-H70)
• File:Pequetics.jpg (800×291)
• File:Pequetics2.jpg (600×450, camera Sony DSC-WX50)
• File:Peru classmate.jpg (450×300, camera Canon EOS 7D)
• File:Socializacion.jpg (600×373)
• File:XO 1.5 OLPC.jpg (623×473, screenshot)

First group. Unused advertising, out of project scope. Small photos, camera data is usually missing and if it exist, then always different. I suspect copyright violation.

• File:Evoycarlos.jpg
• File:Inauguracionucanet.jpg
• File:Inicioucanet.jpg
• File:Niñosconlaptops.jpg

Second group. Ucanet is a non-notable project (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki). Out of scope. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of Ch.arunendra (talk · contribs):

• File:DebatoshGuha.jpg (1224×1587, camera NIKON D40X)
• File:DGuha.jpg (1000×1215)
• File:RMTG Banquet Dinner.jpg (1024×647, camera Fujifilm FinePix S1500)
• File:Receiving 2012 Raj Mittra Travel Grant Award, Chicago.jpeg (481×347)

Different resolutions, different cameras. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updarte (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

• File:Brancusi CB MMPI.jpg
• File:Brancusi image small.jpg
• File:Brancusi small image.jpg
• File:Dali Gala Sculp 1972.jpg
• File:Lluis Barba Isolated 9730 detail.jpg (Facebook file)
• File:PIERRE ET GILLESCaligula Baptiste.jpg

Constantin Brâncuși died in 1957. Salvador Dalí died in 1989. Lluis Barba and Pierre et Gilles are still living. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updarte answered me in my talkpage, that (s)he is copyright holder of the images, because (s)he is the photographer. Unfortunately photos about sculptures have double copyright: of photographer and of sculptor. Commons has permission from Updarte, but not from sculptors (or their heirs). Taivo (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this after finding it CC-licenced by its creator on YouTube, and took it to be a student project. The image has since been recognised and captioned on Wikipedia as being "from District 9", a commercially released film, which presumably means that the animator shouldn't have CC-licenced their YouTube video in this way. McGeddon (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per uploader and COM:LL. --Sealle (talk) 12:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining contributions of ErickWayne (talk · contribs):

• File:Assinatura Erick Wayne.png
• File:Assinatura Erick Wayne PNG.png
• File:Erick's Photo.jpg
• File:Erick Wayne Assinature.png

Unused personal files, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are last remaining uploads of Efesxtra (talk · contribs):

• File:Eren ve Bira.jpg (960×720)
• File:Men alive.png (523×331)
• File:Muzaffer Düzgün.jpg (2601×1706, camera Asus Z002, screenshot)
• File:Olacak O Kadar - Nebalet.png (555×386)
• File:Resim Prisma.jpg (1080×1080, unused art of unknown artist)
• File:Temel Hakkı Karahasan.jpg (500×636, camera Samsung GT-E2222, photo of photo)

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. I deleted speedily 3 files from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Depicted person is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in ru.wiki. Out of project scope.
Этот человек не называли ни в енвики, ни в рувики. Кажется, он не является важным. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• He was modern artist, in ruwiki article about him was deleted as not notable per ВП:БИО (~WP:BIO). Dmitry89 (talk) 12:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unlikely to be own work. Appears all over the web; see here (slideshow) and here for examples. It's even in a slideshow on the architect's homepage. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a screenshot of.. Someone's blog? I doubt very much the profile image in particular is released under the terms provided. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]