![]() | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe article doesn't actually explain what Saprof is. Is it a computer program? Biscuittin (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
SAPROF is a book, containing the instructions for assessing and rating 17 protective factors which serves to supplement any other assessment of risk factors (e.g. the widely used HCR-20) employed for predicting the likelihood of violence in forensic psychiatric patients or similar kinds of people. NRPanikker (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nevertheless, the article still doesn't explain what Saprof is. This article explains what the acronym SAPROF means, which is short for Structured Assessment of Protective Factors, and indicates it is used as a forensic psychiatric assessment tool to predict future violence. But the article still gives very little context about when and where its use is appropriate and what it is intended to assess and who might benefit from its use. Also, the article and sources refer to the capitalized version of the word, not the lower case version, so the article title should be SAPROF, not Saprof, as that would be in keeping with the criteria for naming articles precisely. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphan article message
editPlease help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.