![]() |
|
Welcome to the dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is an informal place to resolve small content disputes as part of dispute resolution. It may also be used as a tool to direct certain discussions to more appropriate forums, such as requests for comment, or other noticeboards. You can ask a question on the talk page. This is an early stop for most disputes on Wikipedia. You are not required to participate, however, the case filer must participate in all aspects of the dispute or the matter will be considered failed. Any editor may volunteer! Click this button Noticeboards should not be a substitute for talk pages. Editors are expected to have had extensive discussion on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) to work out the issues before coming to DRN.
|
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
RRR | Closed | SaibaK (t) | 8 days, | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 10 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 10 hours |
Cyril Ramaphosa | Closed | JoshuaJ28 (t) | 2 days, 18 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 2 days, 16 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 2 days, 16 hours |
Jagtar Singh Hawara | New | Write&Publish (t) | 8 hours | None | n/a | GSS (t) | 1 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 06:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If this page has been recently modified, it may not reflect the most recent changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
Current disputes
editRRR
editClosed due to lack of response. The other editor appears to have gone on vacation. The filing editor should resume editing the article, and discussing with other editors on the article talk page. The filing editor may add the paragraph in question boldly but not recklessly, and should be ready to discuss its addition. When the other editor returns, they should resume discuss on the article talk page. If there is lengthy and inconclusive discussion on the article talk page again, a new request can be made here. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Cyril Ramaphosa
editClosed. Not all editors have been listed and notified, and there wasn't extensive discussion on the talk page. Please continue the discussion on the talk page. Keep in mind that MOS:IMAGEQUALITY states (emphasis added) Poor-quality images—dark or blurry[...]—should not be used unless absolutely necessary.Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Jagtar Singh Hawara
editHave you discussed this on a talk page?
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.
Location of dispute
Users involved
Dispute overview
Revert by user GSS because he had an issue with the lead section. However, I revised it to reflect his concern. My edit contains generally the same content, and I have improved the grammar and updated the references with reliable sources. GSS says he has an issue with other areas of the edit; however, after asking which other sentance, he has not yet specified. If there is an issue with a particular sentence, it could be revised. Why revert the entire edit, which took me considerable time to contribute? I'm trying to resolve this in good faith; however, it does not seem the same from the opposing side.
How have you tried to resolve this dispute before coming here?
Talk:Jagtar Singh Hawara#Revert by GSS User talk:GSS#Jagtar Singh Hawara
How do you think we can help resolve the dispute?
My contribution should be respected, and if there is an issue with a particular sentence, it could be revised, I am open to compromise.
Summary of dispute by GSS
editWrite&Publish is attempting to whitewash the article by pushing the same narrative that user "1forever&ever" had previously promoted. When asked to explain why they removed crucial information from the lead section, they failed to provide a convincing answer, responding instead with "In my opinion." Additionally, the user removed essential content from the infobox and other parts of the article and added content without proper sourcing. This behavior mirrors that of user "1forever&ever," who was blocked just three months before this account was created. Given the similarities between their contributions and those of "1forever&ever," I have filed a SPI (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NZMann). Thank you, GSS 💬 05:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)