User talk:CanonNi/Archives/GIV
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sharh al-Sunna
Hi, what's the copyright URL that you've tagged Sharh al-Sunna for? I can't find the copyvio online. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Wikishovel, I'm not actually sure. I saw this edit, which said the article contained copyvios and requested RevDel. Sorry if that was the wrong thing to do.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 05:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
So, there is this new user who recently edited the Thai Airways Flight 261 article and removed some content about what the pilots said. The thing is that it was cited content, however, he says that he was a survivor of the crash and he knows that the pilots said nothing to them about returning back to Don Mueang International Airport. Now I'm not experienced enough to deal with this unusual situation and I know that you have way more experience than me so... yeah. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've reverted their edit. To deal with situations like this, I would recommend using tools such as Twinkle, which can revert and warn editors with a few clicks. Thanks for contacting me.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
check my talk
you should check my talk. 50.29.96.85 (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, what exactly do you want me to know? Your talk page seems to be a complaint of a page being broken. Could you specify which?
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 06:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) - Also, are you connected to LCJUNIOR1220 in any way?
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
2409:40E2:2013:CDB4:8000:0:0:0
That's an LTA – see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Master12112wp. Hindi and Odia profanity spam are what they do, and when you leave messages on their talk page it probably adds fuel to the fire; also, don't edit war with them by reverting more than three times. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 05:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I won't warn or edit-war with them then.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 05:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Would you be interested?
- Hello, CanonNi,
- I don't know if you remember me, but we both participated in a discussion on the talk page of Black Sea slave trade, and I appreciated your effort in that issue (the problematic user has reappeared there, but I hope and trust they will not be succesful, since the matter seem settled). A similar issue has recently came up. Since you were interested in protecting Black Sea slave trade against attempts of bias, you may also be intrested in the talk page of slavery in al-Andalus; nothing has yet been done, but it likely will be.
- A user who have shown what I believe to be bias have been allerted to the article: [1] The first user have adressed valid concerns which I have adressed, but M.Bitton have shown bias in other articles in this topic issue, and from what is said, I am concerned that this article will be subjected to bias editing. You will see my concerns on the article talk page. Since posting that, another user has allerted me that M.Bitton may have been on ANI for bias editing, but I do not know if that is true.
- Perhaps you could be persuaded to put the article in your watch list, and adress future bias editing by M.Bitton? I would have done it myself, but I must be honest enough to say that my health is not good enough to engage in such a thing, and I have been blunt enough to explain why in the talk page. But I am still concerned enough to want to at least attempt to do something to protect the article. Of course, there is no need for any action at all at present; but since I know you to be interested in the subject, I would be grateful to know that a non-bias and serious contributor with respect for a non bias view had the article under watch. If you are not intereted, perhaps you can recomend another user to contact? Thanks. All the best,--Aciram (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Aciram, and thanks for contacting me. I definitely do remember you, and I appreciate your great work. I will definitely monitor the article, and watch out to M.Bitton and other accounts. Thank you for trusting me, but to be honest, I believe that I'm not experienced enough to deal with things like this, and that my knowledge in the field is not enough to make decisions about the article's topic. I would recommend contacting active members of WikiProjects, such as WikiProject Human rights and WikiProject History. Again, thank you for contacting me, Aciram.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 11:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Aciram, and thanks for contacting me. I definitely do remember you, and I appreciate your great work. I will definitely monitor the article, and watch out to M.Bitton and other accounts. Thank you for trusting me, but to be honest, I believe that I'm not experienced enough to deal with things like this, and that my knowledge in the field is not enough to make decisions about the article's topic. I would recommend contacting active members of WikiProjects, such as WikiProject Human rights and WikiProject History. Again, thank you for contacting me, Aciram.
- Thank you for your kind words, and sorry for not answering before. I am relived that you have put the article on your watchlist.
- In these situations I feel rather helpless; while I am confident in my knowledge about the subject matter, and I know that every citation written can be fact checked in the digitalized books by anyone without much concern, my main occupation on Wikipedia is to write, and I have less knowledge about which regulations to appeal to and who to contact in situations like these. The fact that I suffer from exhaustion also creates an inhibition to attend to such issues. I am therefore grateful when a user with more knowledge and energy can provide advise.
- I understand your hesitance when it comes to the article subject; but nothing has yet occurred, and when and if it does, it is good to know that you, who in contrast to me will at least know who to contact, will be allerted. I am aware of my own limitations, but the non-bias principle is important to me, and I was aware of the sensitivy of the topic beforehand. This is a relief. Thanks again!--Aciram (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- No problem at all!
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 23:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- No problem at all!
Reply
Hi. I have already explained in my first edit that the text in “LGBT people annd Islam” are outdated sources, and that there should be reliable sources cited. It was not a mistake, and I explained why I made the edits. I think you made a mistake. Please revert your edits. Thank you. ElephantMario (talk) 11:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're right, sorry! I've self-reverted.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 12:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please re-revert you were correct to revert elephantmario. The sources are still accurate in fact the constitution has not eliminated the death penalty for homosexual relations under Sharia, and ElephantMario is an alt of BalloonMario, who is a banned alt of another user. 2604:2DC0:101:200:0:0:0:1B1D (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. You are a sock puppet account of Jacobkennedy. ElephantMario (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, CanonNi! This might be a stupid thing to talk about this situation but I need help. This User keeps on adding back an image which has no REAL value in this article. He said that the image shows the same exact aircraft involved in the accident but working with a previous operator. I believe that showing how the aircraft, by detail, matters, so I replaced that image with this one. I told him this but he keeps on adding it back. Please help me out here. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine sorry for the late reply. I would recommend starting a discussion on the article's talk page first. And if the dispute continues, consider asking for a 3rd opinion. However, please keep in mind the 3 revert rule and never edit war. Thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
I also
but don't know how Realmonupaul (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, what? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible return of LTA
Hi, I think Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lazy-restless is back. This was added by Bengali editor. Yesterday and today, two new IP added same text (see page history, also IPs editing history). I can request for CU but most likely will be declined. Their behaviour and editing preferences are very similar. Consider blocking those IP ranges (you can use this tool to calculate) or semi-protect the article so that IP cann't edit (they frequently edit those page). Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, clicked wrong page, i meant to give this message to User:Ad Orientem. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Fixed typos
Hello, I have fixed some typos on User:CanonNi/You're free to leave. I understand that the essay is in your userspace, so feel free to revert if necessary. Cheers, xRozuRozu (t • c) 17:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Saw the changes, thanks! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 21:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)