User talk:Cinderella157

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Greetings! I would like to thank you for your efforts in giving an unrequested third opinion and reaching consensus in Talk:Malta convoys. Even if you were unsuccessfull, I appreciate your sound intervention. Best regards, Lord Ics (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2017

Greetings Cinderella157, I was just wondering why you have undone my edit on the military infox box regarding the 1965 war? Thank you. Ssateleshan (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see TP per edit summary - specifically Talk:Indo-Pakistani war of 1965#Recent edits. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link to image [1]

It seems to me like there are enough RS to support such a delineation (a couple google searches easily verifies this). Do you concur? Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 07:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RadioactiveBoulevardier, I presume you are talking about the Durna River to which this source (probably not an RS but nonetheless useful) refers? I did searches (on and off Wiki) for "Durna" and really didn't find anything else. Perhaps I have missed something since you wouldn't be asking without substance. Are my misses a google regional thing? Perhaps you can send your search link and a couple of links to key hits. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m pretty there are other sources (not necessarily for the specific name but that a discrete battle occurred on the line of the river; in fact, I only saw that one while drafting when I searched the full term) but I’m not quite sure when I’ll have time to dig them up. Certainly DeepStateUA and Bohdan Myroshnykov discussed it on multiple occasions in terms of operational-tactical dynamics.

Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 15:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RadioactiveBoulevardier, draft away but I would consider adding content to Eastern Ukraine campaign in the first instance. Operational-tactical dynamics etc may fit better in a higher level article than one more specific to the Avdiivka region? Cinderella157 (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A certain user of Serbian Wikipedia simply won't give up. He wants to return to English Wikipedia so that he can advocate his (pro-Russian) point of view. He is agitating for his return on Serbian Wikipedia. So far he has convinced some administrators to support his cause. You know the guy. :) You reverted his edits some time ago. You can see the discussion here Владимир Нимчевић (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Iraq War, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An ArbCom motion which relates to you has been proposed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Motion: Cinderella157's topic ban suspended. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 14:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit? Nearly every other war has flags in the infobox. Russian invasion of Ukraine, World War I, World War II, and even Second Italo-Ethiopian War all have flags in their respective infoboxes. History6042 (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, per MOS:INFOBOXFLAGS, while flags are permitted in infoboxes for military conflicts, they must still serve a useful purpose. This can occur when there are more than two combatants on one side. This is not the case in the subject article. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But what about Second Italo-Ethiopian War, it was the same sides as this one and yet has flags? History6042 (talk) 23:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just because WP:OTHERTHINGS exist doesn't mean they are right. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS thank you for pointing that out. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know and you are welcome for me pointing that out. History6042 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 00:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding German war effort

On Siege of Chernihiv you have reverted my edit, stating, "The lead is a summary of the body of the article. We don't write the article in the lead. This revision is not a sumary of the body of the article" It would be appreciated if you could give an example of how it should have been written. Or you could've fixed my edit rather than just revert it completely. Pusf.smbd (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary is pretty clear. If you think such material should be written into the article, write it into the article in an appropriate place; not the lead. The WP:ONUS falls to you to achieve consensus for inclusion. What has happened in Chernihiv oblast is out of scope for an article about the city of Chernihiv. Cinderella157 (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]