Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/23

Dubious license claim; no reason offered why 1994 video from Mexico would be PD-US. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your request for deletion, the license was changed Gio Antonio (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Cc-zero" - why? Question remains. How is it known that this 1994 video by "unknown author" is free licensed? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos (INAI) approved the declassification of a video recording. This video was declassified and released by the newspaper “El Sol de México.” My references are: https://www.unotv.com/noticias/portal/nacional/detalle/pgr-debe-dar-a-conocer-videocasete-asesinato-colosio-246095/ and https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/nacional/revelan-video-no-editado-del-asesinato-de-luis-donaldo-colosio/?outputType=amp. I used the previous licenses because the appropriate licenses for this case are not available on this wiki, and the closest match was public domain Gio Antonio (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the artist? 186.172.245.52 02:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't any admin clean up the Category:Personal files? 186.172.245.52 02:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BEcause personal files aren't generally prohibited. A few personal files from contributors are allowed. And that user has some contributions. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, he is not a user. 186.172.245.52 02:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need more infrogmation to understand why this file has not been deleted until now. 186.172.245.52 02:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1920s British photograph. Possibly public domain, license is definitely wrong though. Abzeronow (talk) 03:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep Corrections made. --RAN (talk) 09:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This flag is purely fictitious and there is no reliable source or evidentiary evidence that the blue ensign was used in the Yukon Territory before 1965. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This was probably an image I made to convert a gif/png image into SVG and probably didn't know about its existence. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I recommend deleting this file as soon as possible, because at the same time the Northwest Territories did not have any official flag, and the same goes for the Yukon. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this flag image is currently in use across a number of wikis. It'll need to be replaced or removed there before it can be deleted from Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio - not convinced this is own work of uploader, appears elsewhere on the web before it was uploaded here TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New file available Assisi algarve (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. I am in this image. I have never given my consent for this image to be posted, 2. almost all people in this image are of minors 2A02:A468:838E:0:F1E6:7D67:FD8E:9AE8 08:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support delete – I apologize for uploading this back then. It has no good purpose on Commons. ~Mable (chat) 17:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Out of scope person (F10) making COM:Nudity. Deleting 186.174.88.156 21:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is neither a personal image nor out of scope. And it's also not new, so COM:NUDITY doesn't apply, either. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modern recording of the anthem of the Crimean Tatars. The song itself is in the public domain, but this recording is not. It's actual origin is a 2015 video by Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar TV channel ATR (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG_uiAeBN-c), meaning it's a copyright violation on Commons.

The instrumental version, File:Ant Etkenmen (Instrumental).ogg, uploaded by the same user, appears in Youtube videos since at least 2019 (such as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuAaXP4Vtr8), but I was unable to pinpoint its exact origin. However, it's also a modern recording and closely follows ATR's vocal rendition, so I believe it also comes from ATR or was recorded by the same group, and is a copyright violation here as well. Solon ^26.125 08:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before deleted in Commons, This file was been used in many different projects. It suggested to replace another one. TentingZones1 (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TentingZones1, it's easy to find one old recording of the anthem on Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlujV8NCjXI), but I'm not sure if it's from 1917 or later, so I don't know if it's in the public domain. Solon ^26.125 04:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Solon26125: No sound recording year found in video description. Not sure is public domain or not. TentingZones1 (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

classified map, obviously copyrighted by the Israeli Army DGtal (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyrignt https://www.soccerzz.com/player/joao-pimenta/20380 Remy34 (talk) 08:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The tag {{PD-old-70}} cannot be used on pre-1978 US works . The eBay link has the full scan and it states "Copyright 1944. Paramount Inc." To keep this image we need to check if the copyright was not renewed. Günther Frager (talk) 08:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but how to check that copyright? Allontanato (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Pablo Picasso died in 1973, less than 70 years ago. Please remove it now and put it back in 2044. JopkeB (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio: The picture seems to be from a website, Doubt on the own work claim, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong date, probably wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 09:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong date, probably wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to have picture of my guitar on Wikipedia anymore. Plus, it is currently not being used on any Wikipedia pages. StringDTD (talk) 10:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep. File is within scope and not recently uploaded. While it may not be in use, this is the only image we have of this particular guitar model. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a picture I took of my own guitar. I do not wish to keep it on Wikipedia anymore. How do I get it removed? StringDTD (talk) 06:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion under {{CSD|f1|The image is the screenshot from Microsoft Copilot app. It's copyright is owned by Microsoft Corporation.}}. Clear threshold of originality argument presented in licencing section. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 10:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cc from talk page: If this file violates CSD F1, then this file (File:Windows 11 Copilot.png) also violates said rule. All I did was just update it's revision, as the aforementioned file was an outdated screenshot posted back then in English Wiki. Paowee (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looks below TOO US to me. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per @Lemonaka, this screenshot is copyright-protected software, I uploading this File:Microsoft Copilot Screenshot （2024年3月5日）.png and File:Microsoft Copilot on Bing Search website.png has copyright violation, also this file has deleted. see: My talk page メイド理世 (talk) 11:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Screenshot: screenshot is under COM:TOO, avatar is COM:DM —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 10:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Malayala Manorama copyright (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This logo was previously deleted for copyright infringement as it is property of a private entity. Same user reuploaded it (see their talk page) Kj1595 (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

need to upload.svg file format Raju Babu (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That's not a reason to first delete the jpg file (or at all, actually). PaterMcFly (talk) 12:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In 2017, the artist Constantino Briega Gago (User:C Briega Gago) uploaded 43 files, seemingly for self-promotion or storage purposes. I can't find much evidence that the artist is notable, or that these low- to medium-quality images have any other educational value within the scope of Commons. Please see Special:Contributions/C_Briega_Gago. Sinigh (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

double version of File:Anheuser-Busch InBev text logo.svg Bruce The Deus (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete Alphaosint (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete version Alphaosint (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete image Alphaosint (talk) 13:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete version Alphaosint (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete file Alphaosint (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete file Alphaosint (talk) 13:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Droit à l'oubli Robes éternelles (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source given for these photographs is Google Maps, so it's rather doubtful that the photos are actually the uploader's own work as claimed. The files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

• File:Rangiya railway eco park.jpg
• File:Rangiya railway colony road.jpg
• File:Rangiya railway station in 2023.jpg
• File:Rangiya DRM office.jpg

Rosenzweig τ 14:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph by Walsh, C. W. / Holton, G. F., published in mid 1920s by Bristol & London, Vandyck Printers [1]. Iranian law certainly does not apply, the copyright holders should have died before 1954 to make this a free work. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This not the uploader's own work, this is copyrighted cover art for a video game. Ggoofy14 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Chronus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chronus ([[User talk:Chronus|{{int:Talkpagelinktext Yann (talk) 15:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [reply]

@Yann Please, see the source. Chronus (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronus: It doesn't matter. There is a plausible license. Yann (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann How can an image from a camera from a private school's CCTV system have a 'plausible license'? Chronus (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronus Because it is produced with no human interference, therefore no copyright. Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Furthermore, the image itself has a watermark from the newspaper Folha Vitória. Chronus (talk) 22:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronus That's irrelevant, as the copyright is not theirs, to start with. Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are works of (presumably French) illustrator J. (Jean) Druet, who was active in France in the 1930s and 1940s. They are claimed to be in the public domain in both France and the US, but that cannot be true for the US and we do not know if it is actually the case for France. These works, published in France in 1933 and 1940, by an artist who was apparently still around in 1940, were still protected by copyright in France on the URAA date (January 1, 1996, when the term duration was 58 years and 120 days), so their US copyrights (until the end of 2028 and ca. 2035 respecticely) were restored by the URAA.

I couldn't find a year in which J. Druet died. Since he seems to have been active starting in the 1930s, he was probably born after 1900 and therefore could have easily lived beyond 1954, which would mean his works are still protected in France. The files should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle. They can be restored after 120 + 1 years with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}, in 2054 and 2061 respectively. Or 70 + 1 years pma if a year of death can be found, but not before the US copyrights have expired.

• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-03.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-10.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Marine Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1940 Wehrmacht Kriegsmarine Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany navy uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Air Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1940 Wehrmacht Luftwaffe Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany air force uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright BR.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-09.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-07.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Marine Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1940 Wehrmacht Kriegsmarine Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany navy uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright B.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-00.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-08.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-05.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-06.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Air Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1940 Wehrmacht Luftwaffe Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany air force uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1939 Wehrmacht Heer Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany army uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright BRIGTHER.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-01.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-04.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-11.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-02.jpg
• File:Herval-Druet-1933-Au Pays d'Anjou-12.jpg
• File:Armées allemandes Uniformes et signes distinctifs 1939 Wehrmacht Heer Uniformen Abzeichen WW2 Nazi Germany army uniforms insignia flags etc French artist J. Druet unidentified death year Publ. 1940s No known copyright.jpg

Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne comprends pas votre démarche: J. Druet est mort avant 1945 durant la longue guerre européenne (allez prouver le contraire). Donc ses productions se rangent dans la catégorie de "Author died more than 70 years ago public domain images". Ces images n'ont pas à être effacées.

I do not understand your approach: J. Druet died before 1945 during the long European war (go prove the opposite). So his productions fall into the category of "Author died more than 70 years ago public domain images". These images don’t have to be erased. --François GOGLINS (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Is there any evidence that he died before 1945? Books, newspaper articles, web sites, genealogical databases? Without any evidence, it is just a claim. And even if he died in, for example, 1944, the United States copyright of his works still would have been restored by the URAA as mentioned above. Wikimedia Commons only accepts media which are free in both their country of origin and the United States (Commons:Licensing). --Rosenzweig τ 19:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Même s'il n'y a aucune preuve qu'il est mort avant 1944, il y a la certitude qu'il ne produit plus rien à cette date. Et donc qu'il est certainement mort à cette date. Donc en 1995, ses oeuvres étaient dans le domaine public. Et donc ses oeuvres sont dans le domaine public aux USA.

even if there is no evidence that he died before 1944, there is the certainty that he no longer produces anything at that date. And so he certainly died on that date. So in 1995, his works were in the public domain. And so his works are in the public domain in the US. ----François GOGLINS (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning is deeply flawed. Because he apparently stopped producing content at some point, you just assume that he must have died. Did it ever occur to you that he might have switched careers, emigrated to another country or simply started to use a pseudonym we don't know (yet)? I've encountered cases like this. So no, I cannot accept the assumption that because we don't know any works by him after a certain date that he must have died then. And no, his 1933 and ca. 1940 works that we have here are certainly not in the public domain in the US, as explained above. --Rosenzweig τ 06:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

• File:Robert rebane - bassiga2.jpg
• File:Robert Rebane basskitarril.jpg

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grabbed from Wikimapia ——— https://wikimapia.org/24425007/sq/Kisha-e-Sh%C3%ABn-Kozmait-Livadhja#/photo/8799180 Albinfo (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grabbed from Wikimapia ——— https://wikimapia.org/13486214/Livadhja#/photo/7997153 Albinfo (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph published online in 2013, no proof of publication more than 30 years ago, so PD-Iran is not established. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Iraq war ended in 1988. this photo dates back more than 30 years old. Alborzagros (talk) 06:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alborzagros Per Iranian law, date of publication matters, not date of creation. When was this photograph first published? HeminKurdistan (talk) 06:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced; I have uploaded a newer, more easily modifiable version (.svg) AstroChara (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:FOP Japan Nux-vomica 1007 (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wie alle Wappen der Woltersdorf-Gruppe als Erfindung eines Vereins out of scope. GerritR (talk) 20:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio? not convinced this is own work, i would guess its taken from some government/council website at some point TheLoyalOrder (talk) 21:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigens Werk" - Es handelt sich offensichtlich um die Digitalisierung eines Fotos aus einer Zeitschrift oder einem Buch Lutheraner (talk) 22:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is Press photo, Random photo from internet, Logo, Breach of Freedom of Panorama Saadfghjkl9988776655 (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

非常令人惊讶的指控。所有上传作品均为我自己的创作，根本不存在任何违反使用条款的行为。所有照片来源于我自己的私人网盘，之前从未上传在公开的社交媒��或者在互联网发表。我根本不需要去互联网下载别人的作品，因为我对别人的作品丝毫不感兴趣。如您认为存在盗用版权的情况，您需要给出令人信服的证据，而不是在全互联网上搜索不到任何盗用痕迹的情况下，随便信口开河。Very surprising accusation. All uploaded works are my own creations and there is no violation of the Terms of Use at all. All photos come from my own private network disk and have never been uploaded to public social media or published on the Internet before. I don't need to go to the Internet to download other people's works because I have no interest in other people's works. If you think there is copyright theft, you need to provide convincing evidence instead of just talking casually when you can't find any traces of theft on the Internet. 重庆轨交18 (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep. No logos seen here, no breach of FOP (Mainland China has FOP for 3D objects), not a press photo and definitely not a "Random photo from internet". Not sure what the nominator is onto. S5A-0043^Talk 13:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]