Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 8

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Igor Horatius (talk) 04:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it, but Delete, bad for your privacy. 181.203.82.193 00:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realized it is bad for my privacy Igor Horatius (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It really is bad for your privacy, I express my solidarity with you. Delete. 181.203.82.193 00:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in France, enters French public domain in 2026, but US copyright lasts until 2032. Abzeronow (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Memorials like the Category:Fire Department of New York Memorial Wall tend to get kept. Myotus (talk) 04:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many files of this 1936 monument have been deleted though. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete France has a very low TOO, such monument is complex enough to be copyrighted. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then what is your argument for keeping this? Category:Fire Department of New York Memorial Wall Myotus (talk) 15:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This photo is taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/77758445@N00/11295743/, which is licensed "All rights reserved", a clear copyvio. Wcamp9 (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is a clear violation of copyright.--Mazbel (Talk) 00:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The original image has a notice that says "This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on September 8, 2005 by the administrator or reviewer Flominator, who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date."—Indopug (talk) 11:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the cropped image currently under discussion has this notice: "When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from Flickr under the stated license. The Flickr user has since stopped distributing the file under this license. As Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked in this manner, the file is still free to use under the terms of the license specified. See the Creative Commons FAQ on revoking licensing."—Indopug (talk) 11:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1908 German illustrations, possibly public domain in Germany but Hermann Julius Meyer wasn't the artist, and this work is too young for PD-old-assumed. No URAA issues. Abzeronow (talk) 00:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While the artist is not named in the book (I checked at the Internet Archive), that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2029 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} (if the image was published elsewhere earlier, adjust the year). --Rosenzweig τ 10:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The image appeared in the 1897 edition of the encyclopedia (https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_YQgbAAAAYAAJ/page/n443/mode/2up). I don't see it in earlier printings, but the fraktur text scans aren't friendly to searching. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep OK, that is old enough for {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 17:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding it in the 1897 edition, Tcr25, I agree that this can be closed as kept. Abzeronow (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TinEye shows webhits before this was uploaded to Flickr (which is the only one that's on that account)

https://tineye.com/search/67c7e7951948a9d7a95361bf41b8696ec2b91397?sort=size&order=desc&page=1 Abzeronow (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook? 186.173.197.91 01:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image does not belong to a Facebook page, however, it is present on a University page (see here). I think the request to upload the image applies here, since there are no permissions associated with the post.--Mazbel (Talk) 01:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What does FBMD mean? Facultad de Buenos Modales? 186.173.197.91 01:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An important woman? 186.173.197.91 01:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated Jasavina (talk) 01:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated Jasavina (talk) 01:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated Jasavina (talk) 01:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated Jasavina (talk) 01:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated Jasavina (talk) 01:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). At the time of upload, author claimed that this photograph was in the public domain, so we can't quite delete for lacking a licensing tag. I, myself, don't quite see why it would be.in the public domain. And, for that reason, I'm bringing it here for discussion in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Kazachstanski nygus as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted version  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, it's the copyrighted Oriolo's Felix the Cat: longer legs, no whiskers, a pear shape body, larger pupils, and a stubby tail, see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Felix the cat.svg Kazachstanski nygus (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader asked for assistance in blurring the 2D works in COM:OWR. Abzeronow (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

During a training, someone who was using my pc uploaded it but it's already uolodaed under president of the Uganda society Micheal Kaluba (talk) 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that the nomination tag be removed and the image be renamed, since the image has meta data and it might be used on another article. He was a former president of the The president of the Uganda society B722N (talk) 04:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality, very blurry Takerlamar (talk) 03:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Does not meet the threshold of originality. It is a copy of a ca. 1900 "Dewey Brand" apple crate label. Not enough has been changed for it to be considered an original work.Myotus (talk) 04:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is below COM:TOO US--A1Cafel (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide evidence and arguments, not opinions. Myotus (talk) 15:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I'm trying to upload another image using the same name as this page name. I had originally intended to do so but got the files mixed up and thus a redirect was made to another file. Colohisto (talk) 03:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This does not meet the threshold for originality. This is decoration not art. It reuses existing large Christmas ornaments found in many American shopping centers. If it is copyrightable then every Christmas tree is copyrighted. This just happens to be very large.Myotus (talk) 04:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is below COM:TOO US--A1Cafel (talk) 12:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide evidence and arguments, not opinions. Myotus (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Image from the 1961 film Wild in the Country. No evidence that the film is in the public domain. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While investigating a categorization clusterfuck created by Lieutcoluseng, I see they removed the {{PD-USGov}} license tag. Another editor restored that tag with zero regard for the fact that this is not a work of the U.S. government. It obviously runs afoul of COM:TOO, also. Since this was scraped from a webpage published in 2022, itself citing a 2021 newspaper article, it's impossible to verify if this meets any PD criteria related to the lack of a copyright notice. The uploader's contributions show evidence of possible other COM:TOO-questionable uploads and similar misuse of PD-USGov. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable Skratata69 (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused file, personal file. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 05:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Future is our (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New user. One file is an old image, unlike that own work. The other is thumbnail-like image, unlike that own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Deletion per COM:PCP

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Single uploading by the user. Small image, no EXIF-data (or no satisfactory EXIF-data). Unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP Estopedist1 (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal file Estopedist1 (talk) 06:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IgnasUVU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyrighted maps from wetter3.de

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IgnasUVU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screengrabs or photos of existing images from unknown source, missing original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   14:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kyllisaard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

images by Category:Parikas brothers (died 1958 and 1972, respectively) are not public domain yet

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

70 years have not passed since 1972. Nationalization has nothing to do with if (or if it would, then everything would be free... soviets didn't give a damn about copyright). Kruusamägi (talk) 11:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the video itself is licensed under the CC-BY license, the gameplay might be copyrighted. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 07:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file. Photo without much information about purpose. No educational value. Zafer (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ville1kivioja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:220424 ILV-KOO-68.jpg is not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. I suspect that other image is also not own work. Deletion per COM:PCP

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused file. Suspicious content, coloring Estopedist1 (talk) 07:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Ruthven as Speedy (Nonderivative); no evidene tio support claim, worthy of conversation  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added several images but unfortunately the name was incorrect so I corrected the name to my likings. This redirect is not in use and so I would suggest to delete the redirect to clean things up. Thanks! /edit oops, it looks like the image will be deleted and not this redirect? sorry for the inconvenience but please onlye delete this redirect. Not the image this redirect directs to Grimson73 (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added several images but unfortunately the name was incorrect so I corrected the name to my likings. This redirect is not in use and so I would sugggest to delete the redirect only (please not the redirected picture itself) to clean things up. Thanks! Grimson73 (talk) 08:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DanassC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

promotional, unused files

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Koskisjukka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio https://www.elektrofachmarkt-online.de/steckvorrichtungen/cee-material/cee-notstromeinspeisung/CEE-Wandstecker-32A-5-polig-1h-fuer-Notstromeinspeisung-IP67.html darkking3 Թ 10:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Geraldine199925 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these are in use and two claim ownership by two different authors, neither of which are the uploader

Dronebogus (talk) 10:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Emeraldcityserendipity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Thumbnail IMG 4183.jpg is found in a source that predates the Commons upload, and the other two have the same low-res, website-y format. Seems likely to be copyvio/no permission/wrong license-type uploads.

Sinigh (talk) 10:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this picture is need to be updated because the quality is low BloodyButterfly02 (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by GERARDO CERASE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contrary to the information provided in its description, File:Madre Eucaristica.jpg is attributed to a Christian organization in Italy by its watermark. Said organization is currently using the image on their website. Judging by the quality of the other image, it appears to have been taken from a similar source. Both images are long-term unused files.

Sinigh (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo fake. Not is Brian Aguirre. Is Matías Soulé. Reghldg (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file does not need to be removed; it can simply be renamed. nicolas talkpage★★★ 14:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

se ve como un dibujo infantil, inadecuado para Wikipedia Uregapedia (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work claim doesn't look very credible. 186.173.197.91 11:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Rommaneygasse[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dario Matrone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different cameras, 2 with author info in exif, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work? 186.173.197.91 11:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Parisienne d'adoption (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One claimed as own work but the exif has been blanked so we can't see who really took it. One has a source with no free license

Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hegert93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 12:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Adomas Gineitis from his family album. RemisC (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reprodukcja złej jakości, w czerni i bieli, załadowałam nowy plik MNK Agata (talk) 12:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore PosifCool (talk) 12:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore PosifCool (talk) 12:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore PosifCool (talk) 12:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore PosifCool (talk) 12:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image, per here. BrazilianDude70 (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PRP: There is no information about copyright on images of Rwandan banknotes.

0x0a (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Moritz Kreis - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page dependent on deleted or non-existent content. The source for links to the page that does not include this image 38.73.248.183 14:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep -- It was listed on that website at the time of her appointment to the council. Metadata verifies information.
Corky 00:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logos with creative designs that exceed COM:TOO China. No proof of authorship and publication date provided to substantiate {{PD-China}} claims.

Wcam (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: It is now more than 51 years since the original design entered the public domain, and the image was published before 1996. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 01:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence? Wcam (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EN- I want to delete the photo because there is a risk that malicious individuals could misuse the signature. I think it is better to remove it for the author's security. I believe the signature can be published in the future, perhaps posthumously. Thank you.


FR- Je veux supprimer la photo parce qu'il ya des riques que des personnes mal intentionnés utilise sa signature à mauvaise escient. Je pense qu'il est préférable de le retirer pour la sécurité de l'auteure. Je pense que sa signature pourra être publié dans un avenir proche, peut être posthume. Merci Carine K Joseph (talk) 14:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Author's request Uzanta diskuto:Kotavusik, unused, duplicate. Taylor 49 (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author's request Uzanta diskuto:Kotavusik, unused, duplicate. Taylor 49 (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work claim. Low resolution and EXIF data indicating the image was generated with GD strongly implies this image was just downloaded from the Internet somewhere. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University coat of arms - not "own work" as claimed Arjayay (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão Eughoost disc. 15:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do autor Eughoost disc. 15:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do autor Eughoost disc. 15:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do autor Eughoost disc. 15:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do autor Eughoost disc. 15:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do autor Eughoost disc. 15:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do carregador Eughoost disc. 15:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do carregador Eughoost disc. 15:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sem permissão / A pedido do carregador Eughoost disc. 15:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image has appeared in mulitple websites: [1], [2], [3]. Unlikely the work of upoader as there is no EXIF. 106.51.178.51 15:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under COM:F1 -- DaxServer (talk) 06:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cartoon Network Too 2012 logo.png.

0x0a (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Robert Maybach - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:FOP US. Yoda Fountain is located in the United States and Yoda is copyrighted character. --IDCM (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

photo nominated for quick deletion because it's all over the internet (example). But if you look at the size of the photo and the metadata, you'll see that it's an original photo. LEfimov (talk) 16:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the media file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please open a regular deletion request and remove this template. - that's why I opened this discussion. LEfimov (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; shows artwork whose author died in 1962. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is courtesy of Stadtarchiv Brackenheim.
Dieses Foto wurde (mitsamt weiteren Unterlagen) von den Erben Diemers der Stadt Brackenheim vermacht. Itala Sveva (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the copyright notice at the bottom left of the image, this is an official movie poster and doesn't seem to be released under a free license. PaperHuman (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong license - as of the original commercial use is forbidden Les Meloures (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong license - as of the original commercial use is forbidden Les Meloures (talk) 17:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The low quality image seems to have no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects Veroforus (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept, no consensus to delete, no reason requiring deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine any possibilty to use this picture in one of our projects. I don't see that the people in this picture agreed to publish this picture under a free licence (on flickr), so their rights may be violated. Paintdog (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per previous; no faces are visible so personality rights do not seem a problem, this photo and a couple others from same series are the only actual photos as opposed to artwork depictions we have of the practice; the subject "pegging" has articles in more than 30 languages. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, but not for the proposed reason. Both this image and File:Strap-on pegging (cropped).jpg are cropped versions of File:Strap-on pegging.jpg. This file is unused and low-resolution; the other cropped image is in use and higher resolution, and is cropped slightly differently to focus better on the subject. Nothing is lost by deleting this version. Omphalographer (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don’t see this as being any better or worse than the others; having a bunch of functionally redundant versions of a file is acceptable even if it’s not really an ideal situation (i.e. look at how many nearly identical versions of File:Anime Girl.svg there are) Dronebogus (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Filen fungerar inte. Tekniskt fel! Ny fil finns uppladdad. FFswe (talk) 17:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Scientificfuture (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If I understand the machine-translated description correctly, these images have been taken from a documentary and are likely not free.

Sinigh (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Times renewed the copyrights from 1934, see https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopyrig3162libr/page/459/mode/1up?q=%22new+york+times%22 Günther Frager (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The New York Times renewed the copyright of the 1943 issues, see https://archive.org/details/catalogofcopy19713252libr/page/423/mode/1up?q=%22new+york+times%22.

Günther Frager (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I removed two files as they were part of an advertisement, so not the property of the New York Times. The drawing also has no copyright symbol. Günther Frager (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


الصورة تعود لي ونشرت من صفحة او حساب قديم والان تسبب لي الاحؤاج Redaalmyaly (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Appears to be COM:DW screenshot of a video - see visual characteristics, low res, no camera EXIF, etc. Also per uploader copyvio history, this is a COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you can do whatever you want with the image I don't mind Thetyperwriter (talk) 19:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mantenimiento elemental Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 18:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata credits er CASEY PINCKARD, no evidence of permission Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löschen. 186.173.173.81 19:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I initially thought this file was free until I saw the line "Content already published or accepted before the 4th of April will be released in free access (freely accessible to all, but not under a CC-BY license)." in https://www.aanda.org/for-authors/author-information/open-access/. The article this image was used in was published before April 2022, So the CC-BY-4.0 license doesn't apply. Nrco0e (talk) 19:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted artwork; no FOP in United States Bri (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work was published in 1978, and there doesn't seem to be an copyright registrations for this work, so copyright should be expired for this work. Gnisacc (talk) 20:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by new user account, almost no information provided, and low resolution. This may not be their own work. 2601:644:9083:5730:444F:D7AC:7CD0:51ED 19:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Neudorfilse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Jekaterina Mirotvortseva. Foto autor- EKJL..png = Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Other two are old images: Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by HansEST (talk · contribs)

[edit]

one old photo and two newer files. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Single uploading by the user. Small image, no EXIF-data (or no satisfactory EXIF-data). Unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP Estopedist1 (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Random license. Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a German poster by Albin Grau (1884–1971), so it will not be in the public domain there until 2042. hinnk (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nosferatu07.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sussybaka6000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

i suspect copyvio. because other version of that logo is fair use in en wiki, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Billycart_Kids_let_the_good_times_roll_V1.png

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 21:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
The previous logo at "Billycart Kids" was outdated, so I had to replace it with the current, re-branded logo. If you go to their website you can see it as such. Sussybaka6000 (talk) 22:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copy of https://tanja24.com/%D8%AA%D9%87%D9%8A%D8%A6%D8%A9-%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%AA%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AD-%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B7%D9%86%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AA/ Habertix (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

رفع رغم ان الصورة توجد على الموقع يمكن لي ولغيري التقاط مثلها لان الموقع متوفر للجميع.
لذا اطلب منكم رفع طلب الحدف لانني لم اخرق حقوق النشر وشكرا Yasmine zerzour (talk) 08:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright infringement https://kadigest.com/stephanie-nyombayire/ Mazbel (Talk) 23:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:delete2|image=File:Michael W King-Stephanie Nyombayire-Prince Charles-Behind the scene of The Rescuers.jpg|reason=Possible copyright infringement https://kadigest.com/stephanie-nyombayire/}} ~~~~
Hi, what do you need for proof of ownership? The photo is also on this page. https://rescuersdoc.com/rescuers-2/
Please advise thank you. MKPLLC (talk) 13:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Hello, if you look at the attached page, it has all rights reserved. "© COPYRIGHT 2024 | THE RESCUERS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED "--Mazbel (Talk) 14:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Permission was granted to use the photos MICHAELFILMDIRECTOR (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MICHAELFILMDIRECTOR: alternative account of MKPLLC (talk · contribs) Did you send it to a VRT agent? --Mazbel (Talk) 21:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, the website has: The Rescuers Documentary Galleries by Michael W. King is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Does this not qualify as public domain free to use? MICHAELFILMDIRECTOR (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Commons only hosts certain license types, and having CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 is not allowed thus  Delete --Mazbel (Talk) 21:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Declaration of consent for all enquiries must come from the owners public domain email address, right? MICHAELFILMDIRECTOR (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, one more thing. Which license were you referring to that Commons host? MICHAELFILMDIRECTOR (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. It is necessary to have a consent of the author of the photograph in question, since the original license is for commercial use. I recommend you to visit this page to clarify your doubts and follow the licensing procedure COm:VRT--Mazbel (Talk) 21:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fails freedom of panorama in NZ as its a graphic work TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]