User talk:Maltaper

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Maltaper!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

BotMultichillT (talk) 11:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:La Rochefoucauld - Œuvres, Hachette, t1, 1868.djvu, Don't forget to add a completed {{Book}} template on the file description page for your upload! It helps in providing additional catalog data on Commons, as well as on other projects. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nerval - Aurélia, Lachenal & Ritter, 1985.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi Maltaper, 30 mini cats and almost no paintings left to see cannot be a good solution. Please think about it and at least 2 category strings: artist and museum, see above Oursana (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amiel - Henry Bataille, Sansot.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 15:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barre - Le Symbolisme, 1911.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 16:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canova - Briseide consegnata agli araldi - Gesso, Cl. XXVI n. 0046.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit Oursana (talk) 16:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renoir - Portrait de Madame Paul Bérard, 1879.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks

[edit]

Dear Mapltaper, please read the Watermark policy before you upload Watermarked works. It is discouraged and one can get blocked from commons if one uploads watermarked works. The recent uploads (they appear to be over 700, I didn't check all) of files of the Max Beckmann paintings seem to all have a watermark. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

annulation de contribution

[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir annulé https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henri_Rousseau_catalogue_raisonn%C3%A9,_1969_Vallier&diff=prev&oldid=839358326

Ce tableau est une oeuvre de GEROME pas de rousseau??? bye Chatsam (coucou) 16:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai créé tous Category:Classici dell'arte et j'ai utilisé le signe "/n".
"/n" signifie seulement "pas de numérotation mais à se réfèrer à ce numéro," et a une image importante que je ne veux pas omettre.
Example: Leonardo da Vinci catalogue raisonné, 1967 Ottino della Chiesa Maltaper (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cellini - Crucifix, 02marble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.61.247.43 12:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Site Vasari => Courbet

[edit]

Bonjour et bonne année ! Juste une question : j'ignorai totalement le site Vasari et je viens d'y trouver grâce à vos nombreux téléchargements près de 1 350 œuvres de Courbet. Peut-on accorder à ce site un certain sérieux en termes de référencement ? Je suis assez surpris par certaines peintures référencées qu'on semble ne trouver nulle part ailleurs... J'espère que ma question est claire. Bien à vous, Marc-AntoineV (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://vasari.fr/ Maltaper (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Malevich - composition 1914-15, lot.158.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Ha (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canova - Testa colossale di Napoleone, copia antica da Antonio Canova, 879 - Palatina (1912).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ManuelKomnenos (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vuillard - L'Essayage, 1892.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Images from Christie's by Hans Baldung has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MenkinAlRire (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorenzo Monaco - Les funérailles de Saint-Augustin, 08800000024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

The genius of Jacopo Bellini (1989) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MenkinAlRire (talk) 16:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Paintings_by_Albrecht_Dürer_in_the_Galleria_Borghese has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cellini - Crucifix (detail), 03marble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.41.177.91 10:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 81.41.177.91 11:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]