User talk:Siren-Com

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

<mise en sommeil (rajouter {{)> User:MiszaBot/config |archive = User talk:Siren-Com/Archive %(counter)d |algo = old(31d) |counter = 7 |maxarchivesize = 14K |archiveheader = <!>{Talkarchive}</!> |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 <mise en sommeil (rajouter }})>

Bienvenue!

Bonjour, Siren-Com, et bienvenue sur Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour vos contributions. J'espère ue vous allez vous plaire ici et que vous déciderez d'y rester. Voici quelques liens utiles aux nouveaux utilisateurs:

• Premiers pas
• le guide de la Tour de Babel : Commons est un projet vraiment international; voici comment nous nous accommodons des problèmes liés au multilinguisme.
• la Foire aux Questions : les réponses aux questions qui risquent le plus de vous préoccuper
• l'Accueil de la communauté - contient de nombreux autres liens

J'espère que vous apprécierez d'éditer ici et d'être un Wikipédien! Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, vous pourriez vouloir vous faire un compte utilisateur sur le Wikipédia de votre langue préférée, ou sur l'un des autres projets. Incidemment, n'oubliez pas de signer vos commentaires sur les pages de discussions à l'aide de quatre tildes (~~~~), ce qui donnera automatiquement votre pseudonyme et la date, ou de trois tildes pour votre nom seul. Si vous avez avez des questions, laissez un commentaire sur le puit du village, ou posez-les moi sur ma page de discussion. Et encore bienvenue !

Avec toutes mes excuses pour ce chaleureux accueil ! ~ bayo or talk 10:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Message historique

(Poussé hors de Wikipédia francophone le 31 mars 2023, parti sans regret d'un projet en cours de wokisation)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis XVI 2 sols 1791 A avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Union et Force 5 francs an 8 A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeton Louis XV états d'Artois 1722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Technical quality is good. --Plozessor 07:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1972 Piso GF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (I understand that you took the picture, and the 'public domain' template refers to the artwork on the coin, not the picture.) --Plozessor 08:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis XV 1722 jeton Etats de Bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charles X médaille de la Charte 1824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Invalides mnt La Médaille Militaire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marcus Aurelius sesterce Cos II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severus Alexander Cos III - 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You photographed the Vincenzo Gemito exhibition. Please tell me, did you photograph the statue of Narcissus? --Воскресенский Петр (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sure than if I have seen this statue in the exibit in Paris, I will take the picture and put it on "Commons", so I think this statue was not present at the exibit. Not lukky ! ... (after more research) : I have seen again my rushes of 2019 and I have found a picture of Narcisssus but it is blur (not quite sharp picture) and the description is : Atelier Romain, Statuette of Dionysus-Narcissus, Ist century after JC. Naples, museum of national archeology. (62 cm) and not a work of Gemito. I have the book "Gemito" from Paris-Museum. This statue is reproduced, and one of "Fonderie Chiurrazzi" cire perdue copie 61 cm, and the statue by Gemito : 69 cm, 1886, (exposed at the Exposition Universelle d'Anvers, 1885) museum real Bosco di Capodimonte. In this catalogue : This two statues were exposed in Paris (number 105 and 106) ! and I don't take picture !!! It is un bilievable !! Why I don't take this tow pictures ?. If you want to see the blur picture, I can download it on Commons. - Siren-Com (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! France Directoire - 2 décimes l'an 4 A (1795).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, but the coins aren't cut out correctly. At some places they have brown edges and at other places (like at the top of the left coin) parts are missing and blended with the white background. --Plozessor 05:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] Ok I see, I will make another, the problem is about uni directionel lightning and little no sticte orthogonal position. - Siren-Com 16:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] Ok, done, you can see another version of this image... - Siren-Com 14:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I wrote to you in a section archived to User talk:Siren-Com/Archive 6#Reminder 14:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC) about making a malformed deletion request. In this edit, you made another one: not including reason, year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; not notifying; and not transcluding. Such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." I have redirected the category instead, as it stood for almost five years with the unaccented spelling and had three members at the time of your unorthodox rename (see COM:RAC for the proper procedure), and adjusted Wikidata.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 04:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marche contre l' antisémitisme Paris 12-10-2023 - 17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo by Harcourt Studio published in 1960, it is definitively not in the French public domain (70 years after publication for collective works). We can undelete in 2056 when it enters the public domain in the US. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stetten-Bernard Jean studio Harcourt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 12:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Il y a quelques années, dans une discussion, tu avais mentionné que tu avais le livre de Françoise Denoyelle de 1992 sur Harcourt. Est-ce que tu as encore ce livre ? Tu avais noté que les informations générales ne nous avançaient pas. Mais aurais-tu l'amabilité de vérifier à l'intérieur du texte du livre, s'il y a une section qui relaterait la donation des négatifs au ministère de la Culture en 1989 et la faillite de 1991 du Studio et si par hasard Françoise Denoyelle relaterait où sont allés les droits d'auteur sur les photos à ces moments ? Ou si elle n'en fait mention nulle part dans le livre ? Est-ce que les parties du livre de 1992 sur l'histoire du Studio s'arrêtent avant la faillite de 1991, ou après la faillite mais avant le rachat par un nouveau propriétaire en 1992, ou après le rachat ? Comme tu as pu le constater plus haut, quelqu'un a reparti pour un nouveau tour des discussions au sujet des photos Harcourt sur Commons. Ce serait bien si on pouvait trouver des informations solides à ce sujet. Françoise Denoyelle serait une personne qui pourrait connaître ce genre d'informations et qui en a peut-être parlé dans ce livre ou dans un livre ou un article ultérieur. Je ne sais pas si tu as encore le livre et si tu aurais le temps de fouiller ça un peu, mais merci d'avance en tout cas.

-- Asclepias (talk) 22:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asclepias: , bonjour, je ne retrouve plus ce livre mais je crois qu'il s'agissait d'un petit livre essentiellement de photos (il en a plusieurs dans la série) où ne devait pas se trouver beaucoup d'informations. Il existe un autre livre paru en 2012 avec 254 pages qui serait sans doute plus complet : [1]. Il doit être consultable en bibliothèque. Il me semblait que ce problème des photos Harcourt était basé sur un jugement officiel et ceux qui ont créé la licence spécifique doivent être au courant. Cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci. En effet, le livre de 2012 serait probablement plus informatif. En ce qui concerne le jugement du tribunal, si c'est ce à quoi tu réfères, ça dit que les droits d'auteur appartiennent initialement au Studio et pas aux photographes individuels. Mais c'est une question différente de celle de savoir si le Studio avait conservé ses droits d'auteur sur les photos ou s'il les a cédés à quelqu'un d'autre ou s'il les a libérés dans le domaine public lors des donations, faillite et rachat des années 1989 à 1992. Les responsables du Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes disent que les droits d'auteur des photos de 1934 à 1991 ont été libérés dans le domaine public et Commons accepte ces photos depuis lors (voir notamment le Bistro là et là). Mais il y a des utilisateurs de Commons qui refusent de croire le Studio Harcourt (voir là, en anglais). Donc, on cherche plus de sources qui pourraient éclairer la question. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]