Kailash29792

Hey could you also expand the article for the Dhanush starrier Tamil film Naane Varuven? Theoder2055 (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: I think so we don’t need to expand the article too much. But I don’t why do we need to expand this article too much. Some IP editor is adding so much of extra information but only the necessary information needs to be added right?

No such rule. If you feel the article is becoming too big, separate articles can be created.

Can you salvage this: Draft:August 15 Raatri? I mean Tamil films with a single Kalki review get articles. DareshMohan (talk) 08:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've told you quite a few times, the AfC process is incompetent and won't pass any article unless it is C class worthy. You should've moved it straight to the mainspace without going through the AfC process. As for Tamil films, many articles were already created as stubs before I discovered the Kalki reviews in 2021. But if they were put through AfC, reviewers would surely not accept them if they were so short, even if a single review was listed. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is the database Screen4Screen only for some Tamil films? DareshMohan (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Vaazhkai 1949 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page Dharmam Engey is undergoing deletion. Reason: one review, needs two. DareshMohan (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

DareshMohan, can page 116 be used to save the article? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Whistle (2003 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

P. S. I am sorry for nominating don't take it personally. DareshMohan (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Couple of things:

• The title card and poster both read 16 Vayanthinile! What does the CBFC certificate say?
• The credits lists many actors in the opening credits. Were you not able to find the roles of any of them?

DareshMohan (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Common spelling matters, not just the title card/CBFC. As for the rest of the cast, you please add them if you know their character names. Either way the article needs GA reassessment which I'm not finding time for. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did Kamal Haasan have the dialogues prewritten for him or did he write the dialogues for the "Kanmani Anbodu Kadhalan" song? பாட்டில் வரும் வசனத்தை கமல் முன்னரே எழுதிய நிலையில் வரிகளை மட்டும் மட்டும் வாலி எழுதினார். [1] (last paragraph). DareshMohan (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like Kamal wrote the dialogues. This could be a useful ref. --Kailash29792 (talk) 02:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Most of the ref articles in production section of Sivakasi especially from indiaglitz and behindwoods are removed due to not being reliable sources. Are they unreliable ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srivin (talk • contribs)

Srivin, by ICTF standards they are not reliable. But I feel pre-2010 films need those sources as Sify is dead and Rediff didn't cover everything. I have re-added them unless they can be replaced. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

i agree with it indiaglitz and behindwoods are the only ones to depend on for lot of content for 2000s films including the hindu too. Srivin (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My standards for 2000s refs is this. Remove Indiaglitz, Filmibeat if the article has other sources else keep it. DareshMohan (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I contemplated keeping the IndiaGlitz review, but now agree it is best removed since the article isn't deprived. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you check this revision. The user is adding the old and unreliable sources to article. Charliehdb (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply