Jump to content

Talk:EDUN

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Not Stubs

[edit]

This article clearly exceeds the size limit for stubs, making it a start class. Thanks Prabash.Akmeemana 22:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted material

[edit]

Sorry but the recent addition by Miss Bono contains many copyright infringements from [1] I don't want to revert, but it does need extensive re-writing.Theroadislong (talk) 22:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help, Theroadislong, or maybe Cullen, or WTime or Soni or 'P'? I am not very good re-writing things, and I don't the article being reverted either. Just wait until this guys show up and let's see what can we do. Pleaseeeeee. Besides, I can't see that link :'( Ms.Bono(zootalk) 12:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably fixed, Theroadislong. Please inform me if there is more copyvios remaining. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent work, thanks very much.Theroadislong (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, bumping up to C class Prabash.Akmeemana 13:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Soni and Prabash. Ms.Bono(zootalk) 13:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

[edit]

I have set up a checklist that indicates the minimal requirements of becoming a good article. Please once you are done, put a {{Done}} tag under the note. Thanks.

GA Requirements

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Please add some more images. Prabash.Akmeemana 13:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall: This is only a mock review it is not the real thing.
    Pass or Fail:

I will build up to this list as time progresses. Prabash.Akmeemana 13:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The full list of criteria are at WP:GA?. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 01:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why not do it slow and steady, it's reduces confusion for the new guys. Prabash.Akmeemana 02:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was only saying... -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 04:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Numbermaniac, that's a brilliant idea! would you mind doing it? Prabash.Akmeemana 21:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do what? -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 02:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Replacing the GA list ;) Prabash.Akmeemana 03:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What about this now? -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When a criteria is done, replace the equals sign with a "y"(no quotes) -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barney's image

[edit]

Barneys may have devoted its Manhattan flagship's store windows to Edun's pre-fall collection, but this photo does not seem to show that, so appears to be completely irrelevant to the article? Sorry if I've missed something Theroadislong (talk) 14:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove it if you want. I am working to have an image that better illustrates that line. Ms.Bono(zootalk) 14:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finding a better picture to fix ths is proving to be extremely difficult. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 11:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong, Numbermaniac can you fins a free pict of some EDUN's clothing, footwear or handbags?? Ms.Bono(zootalk) 12:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on Commons I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 14:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong what about Flircks?? Miss Bono(zootalk) 14:41, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thats a great idea! Fickr images can be uploaded to commons. Prabash.Akmeemana 14:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've searched on Flickr there is nothing with the correct license. Theroadislong (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong, Prabash. any other site you know?? Miss Bono(zootalk) 15:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Try checking any other file sharing sites with the proper liscense. Prabash.Akmeemana 15:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I would if I had a full internet access. Maybe Theroadislong can do that. Miss Bono(zootalk) 15:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imgur perhaps? Or what about just google images?! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google images have to have the correct liscence. Let's ask Theroadislong since I am not an expert in the subject. Miss Bono(zootalk) 11:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched quite extensively, there appears to be nothing, sorry.Theroadislong (talk) 12:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

My name is Hannah and I am currently working with EDUN.

The logo displayed on the Wikipedia page is outdated. It's actually the logo from 2005. We want to update to the current logo but the edit section of the page won't allow me to do this. I have tried embedding the logo using both the file name of the logo as saved on my computer as well as a URL from an online link.

We are eager to get the logo changed ASAP. Any help on the matter would be greatly appreciated.

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahedun (talkcontribs) 16:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To the left of your screen there is a link called "tools" if you click the down arrow a link called "upload file" will become visible just follow the instructions. Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hannahedun is not autoconfirmed and cannot upload a fair-use logo to the English Wikipedia. She also posted to Wikipedia:Help desk#How Do I Change The Logo On A Page? but we cannot help before we get a url to the logo. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
She also edits as User:Hannahmmullen who is autoconfirmed. Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Autoconfirmartion requires 4 days and 10 edits. User:Hannahmmullen has 1 day and 6 edits. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:46, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok whichever of their incarnations get there first will be able to upload the image. Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the logo URL https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-frc3/c188.47.585.585/s160x160/1234895_10151558865791432_86169466_n.jpg Can you give me tell me my autoconfirm status? As I said we're eager to get the new logo up ASAP! Thanks a million! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahedun (talkcontribs) 14:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finally posting the link. That's just letters in a normal font and not copyrightable per Wikipedia:Logos#Copyright-free logos. This means you could have uploaded it right away to Wikimedia Commons at commons:. Commons doesn't require uploaders to be autoconfirmed, but most logos are copyrighted and can therefore not be uploaded to Commons. I will upload it for you. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded it to commons:File:EDUN logo.jpg and placed it in the infobox at EDUN. The JPEG format is actually designed for photos and poor for geometric figures like characters but it looks acceptable. I see http://edun.com/ doesn't even use an image but just writes the name with four normal letters, so I didn't realize it was a logo when I viewed the site earlier. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thank you so much for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davebell1 (talkcontribs) 16:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

A number of editors with a conflict of interest are editing what was a very good, neutral article close to GA. Theroadislong (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EDUN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on EDUN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on EDUN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]