Jump to content

Talk:Killing of Oscar Grant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 6 June 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Shooting of Oscar GrantKilling of Oscar Grant – The officer in this case was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter. At the very least that means Oscar Grant was killed. The title should indicate that. The fact that he was killed is the most notable fact and should be favored since COMMONNAME is a tie. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, primarily because the officer was acquitted. There was not enough evidence it was an intentional killing. Core2012 14:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2012 (talkcontribs)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

guess wtf back

[edit]

king cap supeRR kid ultra ;)) 172.58.35.126 (talk) 07:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]