Jump to content

Talk:Lord Loss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Note: I'm currently working on a character index for future Demonata books. --Jeff 14:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Format

[edit]

Urgh... the format for this page is terrible. I have yet to read the book, so I don't want to risk reading spoilers, but this really needs fixing by someone. Tartan 18:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

is the character index going to go in the main demonata article?

Infoboxes

[edit]

Can someone add infoboxes for all of the series? Bec is the only one with an infobox Andy mci 19:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in universe

[edit]

i dont think this article does describe it like its real.

Character index

[edit]

Is there really a place for this in this article? If anyone agrees, i'll take it out.--ANDY+MCI=Andy Mci 16:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

Sorry about taking out the whole character section. I'm sure that you spent a lot of time on it, but it really was not appropriate in the article. It took up an unnecessary amount of space, was not to wiki standards, and contained way to many unneeded spoilers from the book. It would perhaps be a little more appropriate on a page dedicated to characters from the series. -AtionSong 15:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i was asking peoples views before i removed it, but it was a pointless thing that should be moved to List of Characters in the Demonata.--ANDY+MCI=Andy Mci 16:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

[edit]

I have changed Trivia to Facts but this still is not saisfactory DragonLK (talk) 19:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a real reason on pointing out that some characters are in the other books, anyone that reads this page either would read the other books, or not really be bothered, its useless information by the looks of it. Moshkin (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

[edit]

This section has a couple of issues which need to be addressed. First, it needs to be restructured to read like an encyclopedia article. Second, it currently looks like a review or fansite as opposed to containing neutral and verifiable information. --Ericdn (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Summary or plot synopsis?

[edit]

There needs to be a summary for this book. This article looks ridiculous without it! 188.48.50.87 (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, it looked pretty ridiculous with the summary that was here previously. It read like a 4th grade book report. If you (or someone) can add a concise, brief summary to the article please do. Syrthiss (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I added one but it's not the best summary, I'll admit. You're welcome to criticise and even more welcome to edit it. Raisin56 (talk) 02:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]