Talk:Yashmak
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yashmak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
De-stubbed
[edit]This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified.
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified.
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 17:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- There is nothing about a stub which implies it is devalued, unreliable or credible. It is simply to draw attention to articles which currently only have small amounts of information (in this case, a single sentence!) I don't know enough on this to expand it myself, but obvious examples of how it could be expanded would be to include a picture, history, information on how common it is, and reasons why people wear it.
- And if there really isn't anything more that can be said on it, then I would suggest a merge with veil, or (since this is basically just a definition) transferring to Wiktionary.
- Please read Wikipedia:Stub. There is nothing wrong with being a stub - indeed, "The community values stubs as useful first steps toward complete articles." Mdwh 17:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)