Template talk:Shell plc

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Energy This template is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles

I updated the template to match the color schema of Shell. If anyone wants to try to get the bottom CTT template to match, that would be cool, but it'll be fine as is. —Eustress ^talk 18:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I agree with having the color schema of Shell, the current template is looks awful and contradicts with the general wiki layout color schema. Maybe it would be possible to change colors slightly (including bottom) or if not, it could be better to change back to the original color scheme. Beagel (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current color scheme is better than previous one. Black letters on a yellow background is fine. However, white letters on a red background is not so user-friendly. At the same time, I don't have any idea how to improve this. Beagel (talk) 04:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank goodness. I couldn't read the orange but thought it was just my old eyes! This is better than the way it was because most people will only see the top bar. I would favor replacing the current sections with black letters on yellow so it's readable. Maybe we can do a line or something of orange to match that logo but white on orange is unusable for text.RevelationDirect (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I may have abused the template format there but I think it looks better. Thoughts?RevelationDirect (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. Beagel (talk) 03:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]