Jump to content

User talk:Maxlii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: Henri du Couëdic (August 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Maxlii, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henri du Couëdic (August 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 17:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henri du Couëdic (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henri du Couëdic has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henri du Couëdic. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Henri du Couëdic, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Henri du Couëdic

[edit]

Hello, Maxlii. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Henri du Couëdic".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 20:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laetitia du Couëdic

[edit]

The article Laetitia du Couëdic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient accomplishments to meet WP guidelines for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw(talk) 09:44, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laetitia du Couëdic

[edit]

The article Laetitia du Couëdic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient wins to establish notability per WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw(talk) 20:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laetitia du Couëdic for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laetitia du Couëdic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laetitia du Couëdic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Montanabw(talk) 07:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henri du Couëdic has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henri du Couëdic. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henri du Couëdic de Kerérant has been accepted

[edit]
Henri du Couëdic de Kerérant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Maxlii. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]