Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bored Gordon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — ξ ^xplicit 04:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bored Gordon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and referencing issues I8a4re (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:44, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —fetch ·comms 01:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. First of all, like a lot of bands, the easily fail all of the WP:MUSIC criteria -- No national tour, no charting songs, no significant media writeups, no awards, etc. -- except that they do have albums. But on Powertool Records. Is Powertool "one of the more important indie labels"? No, not even close. Powertool appears to be (or have been - they seem to be out of business) some guy in a closet making records of local New Zealand bands. Band no longer exists, so its not like they're going to become notable. Herostratus (talk) 03:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.