Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Mardis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12. A very close paraphrase of http://genome.wustl.edu/people/mardis_elaine, which is clearly marked as non-free. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Mardis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially non-notable, written by an author with a potential COI, contains close paraphrasing of a copyrighted source. elektrik SHOOS 23:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear failure of WP:ACADEMIC. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also include (for the same reasons):

George Weinstock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Timothy Ley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as clear failure of WP:ACADEMIC and WP:RS. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO Likeminas (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I created this page from content that I wrote but it is being flagged as too similar to other content on the web (which I also wrote). I have also added further references and selected publications to denote notability. How do I prevent deletion of this entry? --Gremerow (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on grounds of copyright infringement despite subject passing WP:Prof cites in spades. One of several articles on the The Genome Center written by the communications coordinator. Such practices are apt to end in tears. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.