Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow Dynamics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect created. Mkativerata (talk) 04:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flow Dynamics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Google search throws up nothing useful (this article, official website, myspace, false positives and unreliable sites), Google news gives a few hits for the term, but none related to the subject of the article. Was created by someone with a COI and has been tagged as unreferenced for nearly three years. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not pass General notability guideline. Charting on the UK dance chart doesn't really mean anything here. Mattg82 (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No opinion yet, but why does the above charting (if true, unable to verify that so far) not mean anything here? WP:NM does state "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." (Emphasis mine). Arakunem^Talk 18:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They only charted on the UK Dance Chart and not the mainstream UK Singles Chart which the guideline refers to. The dance chart doesn't get much attention in the media. Mattg82 (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rhibosome. I found an article Western Suburbs Weekly ("Dynamic mix of funk" on 24 July 2007) and a short review in The Cairns Post (29 March 2007). Not enough yet for their own article. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete After digging more, I can't find anything to support the claim of charting, UK-Dance or otherwise. The closest thing I can find is a blurb on his MySpace which says that in addition to his work in Flow Dynamics, his other works have charted (which I also cannot independently verify). So we're left with a couple of minor references as DuffBeerForMe has mentioned. As for a re-direct, my first assumption on seeing the name was that it was related to Fluid dynamics. A redir to Rhibosome seems ok if it is a plausible search. Arakunem^Talk 14:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.