Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Helm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Helm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded; I did find a source that gives some degree of verification, but I have no idea whether the awards listed are notable. I'm sending it here without a recommendation one way or another about deletion, so others can figure it out it. The book is clearly notable, but he's only one of the four authors. DGG ( talk ) 01:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia currently has no article on the ACM Programming Languages Award, and it would really help if the creator specified which ACM we're talking about (presumably this one, but I need to make sure), as currently I cannot find any coverage of this award under that name. As for the AITO Dahl-Nygaard Prize, the prize itself doesn't seem notable, even though several of its recipients are.

As for googling this name without specifying an organization, we have to keep in mind that a former US ambassador to Iran with the same name is getting a lot of coverage, and that means a lot of false positives. I would say Delete and create a page on the diplomat. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This fellow has not been significant enough to have secondary writings about him, so ditch it, non notable, as they say per GN... Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and agree with Blanchard that a page on the ambassador of the same name is probably appropriate. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.