Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Macias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Macias

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article about lawyer that fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Little in way of notability to ensure it lasts. Article was deleted by Prod several days but undeleted last night by SPA account at IP: 49.151.149.153 . Simply no encyclopedic knowledge whatsoever. scope_creep (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I concur, the IP simply gave some random links but none of them actually establish genuine convincing of notability, especially apart from simply work mentions and clients, hence delete. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nowhere close to meeting WP:BIO. agtx 20:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.