Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawing by nom same with the last nomination i was concerned about the sources but have been notified about them. Kyle1278 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Smosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
YouTube user(s) that dose not pass WP:notability or WP:web there are only 3 external references one leading to a MySpace page another to there YouTube Channel and to one of their video's no outside reliable sources are present to establish their notability. Kyle1278 02:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable per AfD #2 Sceptre (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- As Sceptre points out, sources were provided in the last AFD that conclusively prove notability. The fact that they're not in the article is not cause for deletion. Umbralcorax (talk) 13:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK thats good for me Withdrawing Nom but it think the sources should be added to prevent further nominations. Kyle1278 14:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.