Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bastard Sword

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sandstein 19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bastard Sword[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage in independent secondary sources is limited to a single review, [1]. Listed film festivals do not appear to be notable, and tellingly overlap significantly with those listed at Ravenstein (film), another Eveshka Ghost production. The primary editors to these articles appear to have a COI. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One review ~~and an possibly significant award at the LA Film Festival.~~ (wrong LA Film festival:D) It could have been redirected to the director but....the nominator just moved their page to DRAFTspace five minutes before nominating their films....so no choice, if we don't want to editwar and make this very confusing...let's DRAFTitfy this and maybe users can make one or two or three decent pages with redirects and merge of content.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With which sources? Across the three articles we have on Eveshka Ghost and their work, the totality of independent coverage is the review identified here and a local news announcement about a screening of Ravenstein (film) ([2]). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With which sources, what? Improve the article about the director? No idea. If you don't think it's feasible, why did you Draft it? My point is: since you Draftified it, let's draftily everything connected with them. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) (see also Draft:The Attack Of The Astroharvesters)[reply]
Comment: Yes, the LA Film Festival is notable.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...which is not the same thing as Los Angeles Film Awards, the festival actually mentioned in this article. It's a cut-rate promotional event designed to trade on the similarity of its name, hoping people won't notice the difference. From their website, [3] Our mission is to promote films, and be another step up in the filmmakers' careers. Each month, our Jury will award the best films through private screenings, and make a special interview with the winner of the Best Picture award. All winners receive a free certificate (PDF/JPG file, ready for print). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I stand corrected. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not finding enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. No strong objections to draftifying so relevant information can be merged into Draft:Eveshka Ghost. However, that page already has an overview of the film and all of the same award listings, so I'm not seeing anything here that would help it meet the notability standard, just a lot of primary (and promotional) sources. hinnk (talk) 22:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.