Orgon

Orgon enerjisi, 1930'larda Wilhelm Reich^[1]^[2] tarafından bir çeşit evrensel hayat gücü olduğu ileri sürülen sözdebilimsel^[3] varsayımdır. İsmi ilintili olduğu düşünülen organizma sözcüğünden türetilmiştir. Reich'ın ölümünden sonra öğrencisi Charles Kelly tarafından hazırlanan son şeklinde orgonun evrenin anti-entropi(bozunum karşıtı) prensibi olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Franz Anton Mesmer'in bilimsel olarak çürütülmüş olan hayvansal manyetik çekimiyle karşılaştırılabilecek tüm doğaya dair bir fikirdir. Carl Reichenbach'ın odik güç ve Henri Bergson'un élan vital düşüncesi de içerik olmasa da, oluşum açısından benzerdir. Orgon, kütlesiz sürekli bir varlık; maddeden ziyade yaşayan enerji olarak düşünülmüştür. En küçük mikroskobik biyomlardan, organizmalara, bulutlara ve galaksilere kadar uyarlanabileceği iddia edilmektedir.^[4] Orgon enerji akümülatörü adı verilen, iç içe organik ve inorganik belli maddeler içeren katmanlardan inşa edilen duvarları olan odacıkların orgonu konsantre hale getirebileceği söylenmektedir. Orgon varsayımına göre bireyin enerjisi maddesel katmanlardan (akümülatörden) dışarı çıkmayıp kişinin kendisine yönelecektir ve böylelikle orgon enerjisinden faydalanılacaktır.

Kaynakça

^ Martin Gardner (1957), "Chapter 21: Orgonomy", Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Popular Science, 2, revised, abbreviated, Courier Dover Publications, s. 253, ISBN 9780486203942
^ Robert Blumenfeld (2006), "Chapter 6. Willian Reich and Character Analysis", Tools and techniques for character interpretation: a handbook of psychology for actors, writers, and directors, Limelight Series, Hal Leonard Corporation, ss. 135–137, ISBN 9780879103262
^
Çoğul kaynak:
- Kenneth S. Isaacs (psychoanalyst), 1999: "Orgone—a useless fiction with faulty basic premises, thin partial theory, and unsubstantiated application results. It was quickly discredited and cast away."Isaacs 1999, p. 240.
- Bauer 2000, p. 159. Henry H. Bauer, 2000: "Reich's personal charisma seems to have misled some number of people into taking his 'science' seriously. His outward behavior was not inconsistent with that of a mainstream scientific investigator. In the light of everyday common sense rather than of deep technical knowledge, his ideas could seem highly defensible. For those who lack familiarity with the real science of matters Reich dealt with, why would orgone be less believable than black holes, a bounded yet infinite universe, or "dark matter" ...?"
- Roeckelein 2006, pp. 517–518. Jon E. Roeckelein (psychologist), 2006: "The current consensus of scientific opinion is that Reich's orgone theory is basically a psychoanalytic system gone awry, and is an approach that represents something most ludicrous and totally dismissible."
- Jon E. Roeckelein (2006). Elsevier's dictionary of psychological theories. Elsevier. ss. 493, 517–518. ISBN 978-0-444-51750-0.
- Robert E. Butts (1993). "Sciences and Pseudosciences. An attempt at a new form of demarcation". John Earman (Ed.). Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. 1. University of Pittsburgh Press. s. 163. ISBN 978-0-8229-3738-8.
- Arthur Wrobel (1987). Pseudo-science and society in nineteenth-century America. illustrated. University Press of Kentucky. s. 229. ISBN 978-0-8131-1632-7.
- Turan, Peter (2013). Practical Applications of the Philosophy of Science: Thinking about Research. illustrated. Springer Science & Business Media. s. 85. ISBN 978-3-319-00452-5. Extract of page 85
- Gordin, Michael D. (2012). The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. illustrated. University of Chicago Press. s. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-30442-7. Extract of page 158
^ Orgone energy 6 Kasım 2019 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi., The Skeptic's Dictionary (İngilizce)

Bilim ile ilgili bu madde taslak seviyesindedir. Madde içeriğini genişleterek Vikipedi'ye katkı sağlayabilirsiniz.

[gardner-1] Martin Gardner (1957), "Chapter 21: Orgonomy", Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Popular Science, 2, revised, abbreviated, Courier Dover Publications, s. 253, ISBN 9780486203942

[blumenfeld-2] Robert Blumenfeld (2006), "Chapter 6. Willian Reich and Character Analysis", Tools and techniques for character interpretation: a handbook of psychology for actors, writers, and directors, Limelight Series, Hal Leonard Corporation, ss. 135–137, ISBN 9780879103262

[3] Çoğul kaynak:
Kenneth S. Isaacs (psychoanalyst), 1999: "Orgone—a useless fiction with faulty basic premises, thin partial theory, and unsubstantiated application results. It was quickly discredited and cast away."Isaacs 1999, p. 240.

Bauer 2000, p. 159. Henry H. Bauer, 2000: "Reich's personal charisma seems to have misled some number of people into taking his 'science' seriously. His outward behavior was not inconsistent with that of a mainstream scientific investigator. In the light of everyday common sense rather than of deep technical knowledge, his ideas could seem highly defensible. For those who lack familiarity with the real science of matters Reich dealt with, why would orgone be less believable than black holes, a bounded yet infinite universe, or "dark matter" ...?"

Roeckelein 2006, pp. 517–518. Jon E. Roeckelein (psychologist), 2006: "The current consensus of scientific opinion is that Reich's orgone theory is basically a psychoanalytic system gone awry, and is an approach that represents something most ludicrous and totally dismissible."

Jon E. Roeckelein (2006). Elsevier's dictionary of psychological theories. Elsevier. ss. 493, 517–518. ISBN 978-0-444-51750-0.

Robert E. Butts (1993). "Sciences and Pseudosciences. An attempt at a new form of demarcation". John Earman (Ed.). Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. 1. University of Pittsburgh Press. s. 163. ISBN 978-0-8229-3738-8.

Arthur Wrobel (1987). Pseudo-science and society in nineteenth-century America. illustrated. University Press of Kentucky. s. 229. ISBN 978-0-8131-1632-7.

Turan, Peter (2013). Practical Applications of the Philosophy of Science: Thinking about Research. illustrated. Springer Science & Business Media. s. 85. ISBN 978-3-319-00452-5. Extract of page 85

Gordin, Michael D. (2012). The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. illustrated. University of Chicago Press. s. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-30442-7. Extract of page 158

[4] Kenneth S. Isaacs (psychoanalyst), 1999: "Orgone—a useless fiction with faulty basic premises, thin partial theory, and unsubstantiated application results. It was quickly discredited and cast away."Isaacs 1999, p. 240.

[5] Bauer 2000, p. 159. Henry H. Bauer, 2000: "Reich's personal charisma seems to have misled some number of people into taking his 'science' seriously. His outward behavior was not inconsistent with that of a mainstream scientific investigator. In the light of everyday common sense rather than of deep technical knowledge, his ideas could seem highly defensible. For those who lack familiarity with the real science of matters Reich dealt with, why would orgone be less believable than black holes, a bounded yet infinite universe, or "dark matter" ...?"

[6] Roeckelein 2006, pp. 517–518. Jon E. Roeckelein (psychologist), 2006: "The current consensus of scientific opinion is that Reich's orgone theory is basically a psychoanalytic system gone awry, and is an approach that represents something most ludicrous and totally dismissible."

[7] Jon E. Roeckelein (2006). Elsevier's dictionary of psychological theories. Elsevier. ss. 493, 517–518. ISBN 978-0-444-51750-0.

[8] Robert E. Butts (1993). "Sciences and Pseudosciences. An attempt at a new form of demarcation". John Earman (Ed.). Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. 1. University of Pittsburgh Press. s. 163. ISBN 978-0-8229-3738-8.

[9] Arthur Wrobel (1987). Pseudo-science and society in nineteenth-century America. illustrated. University Press of Kentucky. s. 229. ISBN 978-0-8131-1632-7.

[10] Turan, Peter (2013). Practical Applications of the Philosophy of Science: Thinking about Research. illustrated. Springer Science & Business Media. s. 85. ISBN 978-3-319-00452-5. Extract of page 85

[11] Gordin, Michael D. (2012). The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. illustrated. University of Chicago Press. s. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-30442-7. Extract of page 158

[4] Orgone energy 6 Kasım 2019 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi., The Skeptic's Dictionary (İngilizce)

[1]