User talk:Frze
Commons:Assistent zum Hochladen von Dateien
--- User talk:Frze.de
--- Fotowerkstatt
--- >>> Norbert K.
Bild des Tages |
---|
![]() |
![]() | This user has uploaded images to Wikimedia Commons. |
2012
[edit]FP Promotion
[edit]![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Eurocopter EC135 D-HZSG Brownout III Brüggemann.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eurocopter EC135 D-HZSG Brownout III Brüggemann.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
2014
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg/170px-Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg)
Dear Frze,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Projektsite Commons:Wikipedians in Seifhennersdorf
[edit]Bitte vergleiche mit abgeschlossene vorläufiger Arbeitssite Wikipedia:Neiße.
Technik- und Materialwünsche
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/Crystal_Clear_app_kthememgr.png/50px-Crystal_Clear_app_kthememgr.png)
Bitte gebt uns hier rechtzeitig (bis 31. März) bekannt, ob ihr einen Leihrechner, eine Kamera oder anderes Material benötigt. Es wird versucht diese Dinge zu organisieren. Spätere Gesuche können nicht in jedem Fall berücksichtigt werden.
8x Batterien AA (Frze)6x Knopfzellen AG 13 (Frze)4x Stange Negativfilm (Frze)2x Stange Kodakfilm (Frze)ausziehbare Leiter um Details von Häusern aufnehmen zu können (StagiaireMGIMO)Auto mit Dachgepäckträger für Leiter (Conny)- Taschen-Einbeinstativ teleskopierbar für künstlerische Gestaltung (Langzeitbelichtung)
- Mit Einbein gibts keine sinnvolle Langzeitbelichtung.--Hubertl (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- small Camera for Snapshots (here are Accu problems) => Ich bring meine Taschenknipse mit, kann jeder haben. Schnappschüsse gehen sofort nach Einschalten, GPS-Erkennung kann allerdings eine Minute dauern. (Nightflyer)
- Ich bring meinen eigenen mit, aber bei WMDE sollten Reinigungssets für Objektive als Restposten der Wikicon vorhanden sein... (Nightflyer)
- Für mich wichtig: Einen UMTS-Stick fürs mobile Internet, davon gibt es mehrere in Berlin (Nightflyer)
- ...
- so Leute, Realitätscheck
- Frze sorgt bitte selbst für seine Batterien und Filme, er weiß selbst am Besten, was er braucht und kann die Erstattung der Kosten dafür mit entsprechendem Hinweis bei WMDE beantragen/einreichen. Ich werde diese Teile nicht einkaufen gehen, noch dazu, wo ich nicht weiß woher, bzw was bei den "Stangen" gemeint ist...
- zum Thema Leiter: bitte zur de:Panoramafreiheit kundig machen! (Kurz gesagt, erlaubt die Panoramafreiheit die Außenaufnahme urheberrechtlich geschützter Gebäude oder Kunstwerke ohne Hilfsmittel wie Leitern, Hubschraubern etc. von öffentlich zugänglichen Orten aus (z.B. Straße, nicht aber Privatgrundstück) und das Verbreiten der so entstandenen Bilder.) Und wenn ein Hausbesitzer eine Einwilligung unterschreibt, hat er sicher auch eine Leiter da. Ich werde kein Auto mit Leiter durch die Dörfer fahrend gut heißen! Es gibt auch Grenzen! Macht so einen Scheiß alleine, aber nicht auf Kosten der Zusammenarbeit!
- Bitte im Auge behalten, wozu dieser Abschnitt ursprünglich gedacht war: zur Evaluierung, wer keinen Rechner hat und noch einen bräuchte und zur Ermittlung, wer gerne den Umgang mit einer höherwertigen Kamera erlernen möchte und dazu gerne eine leihen möchte!
- Ich hab eine Zweitkamera mit 28-135 Zoom (Faktor 1.6) sowie ein Weitwinkel 10-22 mm, falls es wer haben möchte.--Hubertl (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Deshalb auch: ein Stativ wäre toll, aber wer braucht eines? und wer bringt eins mit?
- ich komm mit einem Tri- und einem Monopod.--Hubertl (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- so geht es weiter: --Anika (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
To do
[edit]Da mein Fahrtkosten-Ticket zeitlich unlimitiert ist, werde ich nach Gesundung zum Nachfotografieren losfahren. 04:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
SHD Seifhennersdorf
[edit]- Postamt Seifhennersdorf
Möglichst vom selben Standpunkt mehrere quasi-identische Aufnahmen zu verschiedenen Tageszeiten; auch nachts bitte. Dankeschön.
-
File:1915 Postcard D-SN-SHD 000100 "Seifhennersdorf i. Sa. Kaiserliches Postamt".jpg
- Kleintmühle Seifhennersdorf
Möglichst vom selben Standpunkt mehrere quasi-identische Aufnahmen zu verschiedenen Tageszeiten; auch nachts bitte. Dankeschön.
-
Blick vom ehem. Mühlengehöft Kleint auf Seifhennersdorf
-
Bauerngut (alte Nr. 709 a), Bockmühle gehörte ursprünglich zu d
-
Kleintmühle, Müllerhaus, Oststraße 2
-
Ehem. Kleintmühle, Müllerhaus, Oststraße 2 (alte Nr. 709 b), Hintereingang
Robert Sterl
[edit]Weißt Du wo sich dieses Bild befindet. Diese Abbildung ist ein DDR-Plakat im Deutschen Historischen Museum und herausgegeben von den Kunstsammlungen Dresden. Wo sich dieses Gemälde befindet, konnte ich nicht herausbekommen. Quelle dieser Abbildung ist Bildindex der Kunst und Architektur, object 03180403
. Die DHM-Webseite ist hier. Gruß --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo @Trzęsacz: Vertrauensvoll an Dr. Andreas Quermann ROBERT-STERL-HAUS <kontaktATrobert-sterl-hausDOTde> wenden, schönen Gruß vom Sterl-Freund aus Dresden-Dobritz (da steht sein Geburtshaus!) ausrichten und bitte, da es auch mich interessiert, im CC des E-Mail-Verkehrs mich mal mit reinnehmen. (frzeATgmxDOTde) Danke + SchWE + LG --Frze > talk 12:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Flag of Saxony 10px edged.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
OAlexander (talk) 15:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:WRM Work - Arbeit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Weissbier (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
No consent of the depicted person to the publication of the picture given. Person ist clearly idetifieable und the theme of the picture. Additionally the depicted person could be underage. Weissbier (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept, this is public place (street with a lot of people) and the girl is clearly posing, so she agrees being photographed. Nothing strange or shameful happens in the photo. I thought to delete the photo as out of scope, but the photo is used in de.wiki on user page. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, permission is not needed if {{PD-textlogo}} clearly applies. Jcb (talk) 10:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
2016
[edit]-
Vindobona Decin.jpg
-
Vindobona Decin cropped.jpg
-
Vindobona Decin-2.jpg
-
Vindobona Decincrcr.jpg
Das Bild zeigt zwar einen ehemaligen Postbriefkasten, vermutlich deutscher Herkunft. Dieser ist aber offenbar nicht mehr als solcher in Gebrauch gewesen, sondern dient(e) als Hausbriefkasten. Damit ist es aber keine "post box" im Sinne der Kategorien auf Commons mehr, sondern nur noch eine "letter box". Deswegen hatte ich die Datei aus der Kategorie "Post boxes ..." herausgenommen. --Schlosser67 (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Bildrechte Ladislaus Weiss
[edit]Hallo Frze, ich habe nun die Bildrechte von Ladislaus Weiss, hat leider etwas länger gedauert diese zu bekommen. Wie kann ich dir diese zukommen lassen? odr wie funktioniert das jetzt? Ist es möglich, das bereits gelöschte Bild wieder hochzuladen? LG --MissBoo2312 (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Ruhland
[edit]Hallo Frze, hab vielen Dank für die Postkarten! Ist Dir mal eine mit dem verlorengegangenen Bismarck-Denkmal untergekommen? Es soll am Kirchplatz (neben der Kirche (?)) gegenüber der Oberpfarre (bzw. den Pfarrhäusern) gestanden haben. (Mir fehlt nur noch dieses Bild für die Denkmalsliste).
Außerdem wollte ich Dich wegen der Weiterleitungen fragen. Mich hatten Leute gebeten, das Problem zu lösen, dass z. B. das Heimatmuseum nicht gefunden wird, wenn man in der Kategorie Ruhland ist. Eingeweihte sehen dann evtl. den Gutshof, aber andere geben auf. Ich hatte die WL-Cat.s als Handreichung, auch für Leute, die mir gelegentlich helfen, sich aber in Wiki eigentlich nicht auskennen. War wohl nicht systemkonform oder kann man "sowas" vielleicht doch dulden? Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 12:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo @Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR.
- Die PK habe ich nur kategorisiert - Bismarck, nein.
- Commons ist kein Wörterbuch. Es ist nicht üblich, deutsche Begriffe in dieser Masse als Weiterleitungen anzulegen, und auch noch zu kategorisieren. Auch ist eine Weiterleitung Markt / Marktplatz nicht sonderlich sinnvoll, meines Erachtens nach voll verzichtbar. Ein Hinweis Heimatmuseum befindet sich ... in der Category:Ruhland sollte ausreichen. Wie gesagt, nicht verboten, aber ... Gruß --Frze > talk 22:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Dann danke für die Kategorisierung der Postkarten, und auch für die Antwort. Wenn ich (halbwegs) sauber kategorisiere, ist der Gutshof Gebäude und Denkmal und damit raus aus Ruhland, aber eben außerdem noch Heimatmuseum. Da es nur einen Artíkel gibt und das Lemma nicht so lang sein sollte, ist halt der (Ruhland-übliche) volkstümliche "Gutshof" übriggeblieben. Damit hatte ich dann das Problem, dass Heimatmuseum in der Cat. Ruhland nicht erscheint und die mühsam gebetenen Hochlader (Aussteller aus Senftenberg u. a.) sich frustriert abwenden. Aber dann ist es halt so, dass ich die Cat. Ruhland noch zusätzlich zu den anderen beiden (Gebäude und Denkmal) haben muss - so ist es jetzt - oder im Hinweis wäre eine Verlinkung erforderlich. Was ist besser oder ist das dann egal ?. Jedenfalls Danke und Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 23:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:SM LG --Frze > talk 23:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
OTRS
[edit]"Permissions Commons de" <permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org>
OTRS-members
[edit]![]() |
File:Ift Rosenheim.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Frze, ich hab mal deine Zuordnung der Saxonia teilweise rückgängig gemacht. Ein Schiff, das erst 1912 auf Kiel gelegt wurde und ab 1919 Saxonia hieß, kann schlecht 1902 fotografiert worden sein, oder seh ich das falsch? Gruß, --Achim (talk) 12:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Requests
[edit]Hallo Frze, es ist immer ratsam, sich Dateinamen genau anzusehen, damit bei Umbenennungen so ein Mist File:Fahnenspitze Regiment Nationale Volkksarmee DDR 1.jpg vermieden wird. Am besten beantragst du zur Übung gleich nochmal eine Umbenennung zur Beseitigung der Rechtschreibfehler in den 5 Dateien. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Danke für den Tipp. --Frze > talk 00:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Harmonization
[edit]Please read Commons:File renaming#cite note-4. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
20070218010DR Dresden Altes Landhaus Museum für Geschichte.jpg
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/73/20070218010DR_Dresden_Altes_Landhaus_Museum_f%C3%BCr_Geschichte.jpg/220px-20070218010DR_Dresden_Altes_Landhaus_Museum_f%C3%BCr_Geschichte.jpg)
Hallo Frze. Hab gerade gesehen, dass ich mit meiner "Landhausstraße" deinen Edit teilweise wieder rückgängig gemacht habe. War nicht böse gemeint - ich sah genug Straße dafür :) --Derbrauni (talk) 07:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo brauni, ist doch ein Wiki - was soll man da böse sein. Hatte mit Jörg Blobelts Bildern 'ne Menge Arbeit mit der Ent-Kategorisierung, kann sein, das da in der Masse der Bearbeitungen auch Fehler auftraten. Nix für ungut. Danke & SWE wünscht --Frze > talk 07:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:1944-09 KptzS Lüth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jergen (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deine Umbenennungswünsche
[edit]Du hast für mehrere Dateien eines Nutzers einen Umbenennungsantrag gestellt mit der Begründung mehrdeutig oder bedeutungslos. Ich habe für einige mit Bauchschmerzen die Umbenennung durchgeführt, obwohl das so bei den meisten eigentlich nicht stimmt: Sie haben fast alle ja eine Bedeutung, der Nutzer hat den informativen Teil nur hinter den sinnlos langen Zahlen (plus dem Image) gesetzt. Es gibt in Commons:Dateien verschieben einen Abschnitt, wann Dateien nicht umbenannt werden sollen – der erste Punkt davon lautet „Dateien sollten nicht deshalb umbenannt werden, weil der neue Name nur ein bisschen besser aussieht.“ Ich sehe aber hier in gewisser Weise einen Missbrauch, weil der Nutzer wohl sicherstellen wollte, dass seine Bilder schön weit vorn in den Kategorien stehen, ich weiß jetzt aber auch nicht, ob das schon als Verletzung der Commons-Richtlinien durchgeht (Umbenennungsgrund 5). Ich werde Deine weiteren Anträge jetzt nicht bearbeiten, mal sehen, wie andere das entscheiden. Übrigens hat der Nutzer den Dateinamen sinnloserweise auch in die Beschreibungsseite gesetzt, das habe ich für die 4 umbenannten Dateien repariert. — Speravir – 00:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Speravir Wo Du Recht hast hast Du Recht. Diesen Missbrauch zu tilgen war meine eigentliche Intention. Commons:Richtlinien und Leitfäden werde ich mir bei Gelegenheit genau zu Gemüte führen. Vielen Dank & Gute Nacht --Frze > talk 00:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Susanna Mildonian 1969
[edit]Hallo Frze, beim Bild File:Susanna Mildonian 1969 (cropped).jpg hast Du IMHO nicht die Harfenistin, sondern die Tochter erwischt: Königin Juliana und Prinzessin Margriet der belgischen Harfenistin Susanne Mildonian und ihre 3-jährige Tochter. Holland Festival, Amsterdam, 8. Juli 1969 --Ailura (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ach so. --Frze > talk 05:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Causa Manske
[edit]Hallo Frze,
ich glaube ich muss mal eingreifen: Hinter Magnus Manskes Änderungen steht jeweils Widar [1.4] --> das heißt dieser Edit wurde von einem automatischen Tool durchgeführt. Das was dich stört, macht Herr Manske gar nicht persönlich, sondern irgendeins seiner Tools. Seine letze Änderung ohne Widar ist vom 7. März 2017 – seitdem hat er sich vermutlich nicht mehr eingeloggt, und überhaupt nicht mitbekommen, was ihr von ihm wollt.--Tostman (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Na dann ist ja gut. Oder besser nicht gut:
- Magnus Manske, bitte ändere den Bearbeitungskommentar und mach die Bearbeitung als die eines Bots kenntlich.
- Wo ist die Whitelist dieses Bots, um weitere Sinnlosigkeiten nicht zuzulassen? Danke & Gruß --Frze > talk 10:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hast du ihn inzwischen erreicht? Vielleicht muss man ihm mal eine E-Mail (magnus.manske AT sanger.ac.uk) schreiben.--Tostman (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Tostman Dessen - sorry - Massen-Müll ist mir mittlerweile egal. --Frze > talk 10:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hast du ihn inzwischen erreicht? Vielleicht muss man ihm mal eine E-Mail (magnus.manske AT sanger.ac.uk) schreiben.--Tostman (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Memorial ivanchenko tmp.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 10:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
[edit]Hello Frze, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Which files should be renamed? >>> Criterion 2: To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays.
- 4. Only information is the location (broad)
- The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.
- 7. Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
- Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file.
Frederick Douglass
[edit]Where did you get the value of 70 years from? We don't know the identity of the photographers or artists. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Flora of Dresden
[edit]Hallo Frze. Was spricht dagegen, dass dieses Bild unter Flora of Dresden espeichert ist? Genau die ist doch abgebildet?! --Derbrauni (talk) 19:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Mein Gott: Nicht jeder Pubs, der gelassen wird, ist es auch Wert, aufgefangen und archiviert zu werden !
- Enough is enough Category:Unidentified fungi in Germany.
- Bitte lege die Kategorie Category:Leaves of Grass in Dresden als Unterkategorie an oder Category:Drain pipes in Dresden Category:Roof tiles in Dresden. Da hast Du dann genug zu tun zu sortieren. --Frze > talk 04:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Habe ich die Ironie verpasst oder ist deine Replik einfach sehr unhöflich? Schade. Wenn ich zusätzliche Kategorien anlegen will tue ich das. Ich vermeide es aber, Kategorien anderer aus Bildern zu entfernen. Weil ich davon ausgehe, dass der andere sich was dabei gedacht hat. --Derbrauni (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Brauni, Frze ist wohl einfach nur verzweifelt. Da schwappt viel Bild-Müll rein und man kommt nicht klar - weder mit Kategorisieren noch mit (was genau so wichtig ist) vernünftigen Beschreibungen. Habe gerade 4 von hunderten nicht identifizierten Pilzen in Category:Unidentified fungi in Germany entsprechend einsortiert. Ich empfehle nur Bilder zu kategorisieren, die auch einen Wert für die Kategorie bringen, Hervorhebung --Frze und möglichst mit einer Beschreibung die hier wenigstens die Baumart angibt (oder auch die Besonderheit, den Ort o. ä. beschreibt) - zugegebenermaßen meist schwierig. Ich bin nicht sicher, ob ich mich freuen würde, wenn dieses Bild so unter Trees in Ruhland oder Flora of Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz stehen würde, falls es dort genug deutlich bessere gibt - obwohl ich es gut finde, dass jemand die Bilder zuordnet. Und entschuldigt bitte die Einmischung. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 08:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Brauni: Nochmal mein Gott >>> [1]. Sortier es wieder ein, mach keinen Ruß - und gutt ist. Ist ein Wiki. --Frze > talk 15:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Wilhelm Zimmerling - ist o. k. > Talk page stalkers often make very constructive commentary en:WP:TPS. Ich kriege einfach einen Hals, sobald ich das ... Dresden, Germany - panoramio (ZZZ) erblicke ! In einem gewissen Prozentsatz handelt es sich um puren Vandalismus, offenbar vom dutzendfach infinit gesperrten Kay Körner alias Kalispera Dell, der nun durch die Hintertür dem Projekt nicht entgangen ist. Und heut morgen schon wieder das ~721. und ~364. Schwanenbild am Blauen Wonder und im Großen Garten. Fuck. User:Derbrauni/NeuesDresden/2017 July 1-10#3. Juli 2017 Bilder, die die Welt nicht braucht. --Frze > talk 15:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)a
Bilder, die die Welt nicht braucht
[edit]@Brauni: Wer ernsthaft solchen out-gesourcten Scheiß Piss wieder zum Dresdner Schloss re-kategorisiert, hat meiner Meinung nach den Sinn unseres Projektes nicht verstanden oder / und begibt sich auf eine Stufe mit Kay Körner oder / und will dem Projekt / dem Ansehen unserer Stadt mutwillig / fahrlässig Schaden zufügen. Ärgerlich. MfG --Frze > talk 15:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Dein Ärger ist völlig verständlich. Solche Bilder in ähnlichen Kategorien wie in Category:Personal files from panoramio sammeln und warten bis Panoramio und der Bot sein Dienst einstellt. Bis dahin kann manch ein (Urinations-)LA glücken. Ob der Bot nicht wieder dieselben Bilder hoch lädt, ist ungewiss. Viele schiefe und verwackelte Bilder können vermutlich noch in anderen Projekten genutzt oder gebraucht werden (siehe: Openstreetmap). LG Hystrix (talk) 19:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Danke einstweilen. Daphne Lantier hat ein ganzes Dutzend noch viel schrecklichere solcher Bilder dankenswerterweise schnellgelöscht. Kannst Du bitte hier [2] mal schauen, scheinbar wieder eine Socke von KK unterwegs. Best wishes --Frze > talk 20:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hier gibt es eine neue Kategorie (Category:Files from Panoramio, which probably do not correspond to the project scope), neben Category:Personal files from panoramio Hystrix (talk) 23:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Danke einstweilen. Daphne Lantier hat ein ganzes Dutzend noch viel schrecklichere solcher Bilder dankenswerterweise schnellgelöscht. Kannst Du bitte hier [2] mal schauen, scheinbar wieder eine Socke von KK unterwegs. Best wishes --Frze > talk 20:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Bilder rotieren
[edit]Frze, ansehen kann man sich das ja mal. Ich würde aber auch nur GIMP benutzen … Also, welche Dateien willst du rotieren lassen? Sollte es sich um die Bilder handeln, die in de:Hochhaus Pirnaischer Platz in die Galerie eingebunden sind, dann sehe ich bei meisten keine Notwendigkeit zum Rotieren, höchstens zu einer geringeren perspektivischen Verzerrung. — Speravir – 18:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hier >>> Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop gibt es engagierte Nutzer, von denen sich der eine oder andere der händigen Rotation mal annehmen wird. Danke & Gruß --Frze > talk 10:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Noch nicht erledigt oder besser weiterer Klärungsbedarf: Was gefällt dir an meinen Bearbeitungen dieser Datei und dieser nicht, dass Du erneut die Vorlage zum Rotieren eingefügt hast? Ich habe die Bilder so gedreht, dass die Gebäude senkrecht stehen. Eventuell solltest Du auch deinen lokalen Cache erneuern, siehe nach meiner Sigantur. Und bei mindestens einem weiteren Bild ist eine Rotation auch nicht angebracht: In Dresden Johannstadt Park Spielplatz Sportplatz.JPG sind die Gebäude am rechten Rand nach rechts geneigt, aber am linken Rand nach links; das kann man nicht durch Drehen des Bildes korrigieren. Bei Hochwasser 2013 Kiessee in Dobritz.jpg habe ich zugegebenermaßen noch nicht im Detail nachgesehen, aber in der Voransicht scheint der Fernsehturm senkrecht zu stehen – OK, vielleicht leicht geneigt, aber defintiv um keine 2°. Für das Hochhaus vom Pirnaischen Platz hatte ich das ja oben schon angedeutet. — Speravir – 18:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Please purge your browser’s cache or enable JavaScript in your Browser's settings. (You only need to do it once.)
Operating system Browser |
Microsoft Windows or Linux | macOS |
---|---|---|
Internet Explorer | Press Ctrl+F5 | |
Mozilla Firefox | Hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl+F5 or Ctrl+⇧ Shift+R) |
Press ⌘ Cmd+R (reload page) or ⌘ Cmd+⇧ Shift+R (reload page and rewrite cache) |
Opera | Press Ctrl+F5 or ⇧ Shift+F5 | |
Konqueror | ||
Apple Safari | Hold down ⇧ Shift+Alt while clicking Reload | |
Press Ctrl+R | Press ⌘ Cmd+⌥ Option+E (clear browser cache) or ⌘ Cmd+R (update) | |
Chrome | Press Ctrl+F5 or ⇧ Shift+F5 or hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload |
Press ⌘ Cmd+F5 or ⇧ Shift+F5 or hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload |
Linking to a ticket
[edit]Just FYI, instead of transcluding the whole template {{PermissionOTRS|id=2017012710012251|user=Asav}}, you can link to the ticket like this: ticket:2017012710012251. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Gruna (Dresden)
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/Schlauchturm_Herkulesstra%C3%9Fe_16%2C_Dresden_%28485%29.jpg/220px-Schlauchturm_Herkulesstra%C3%9Fe_16%2C_Dresden_%28485%29.jpg)
Hallo Frze. Danke für die Kategorie Firefighting in Dresden beim Bild Schlauchturm Herkulesstraße 16. Ich verstehe aber nicht die Kategorie Gruna (Dresden), da diese schon in Herkulesstraße, Dresden enthalten ist. Gibt es Gründe, die für diese Kategorie sprechen? Gruß, --Derbrauni (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Derbrauni:
- Danke der Rückmeldung.
- AW: Ja.
- Bitte die starre Commons-Kategoriebrille mal abnehmen.
- Die Bilder gehören sowohl in die Kategorie Herkulesstraße (aufgrund des geographischen Bezugs)
als auch in die Kategorie Gruna (Dresden) aufgrund des thematischen Bezugs. - Die Thematik Feuerwehr ist von übergeordneter Bedeutung für den gesamten Stadtteil, möglicherweise wird später mal sogar eine eigene Kategorie Firefighting in Gruna (Dresden) draus. Nur in der Straße kategorisiert wären die Bilder schwerst auffindbar, quasi verschüttet.
- Danke & Gruß --Frze > talk 07:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Frze. Da kann ich grundsätzlich mitgehen. Wobei es im Einzelfall sicherlich schwierig ist abzuwägen, welches Foto "nicht verschüttet" gehen sollte und welches die doch sehr umfangreiche Kategorie Gruna zumüllt. --Derbrauni (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Alan Eyre on Poletik (cropped1).jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 21:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
File:AZU Fräulein Stellas Gespür für Liebenswürdigkeit AZO Dresden Deutsches Hygienemuseum Photo inspired by Marcus Lilge.JPG
[edit]![]() |
File:AZU Fräulein Stellas Gespür für Liebenswürdigkeit AZO Dresden Deutsches Hygienemuseum Photo inspired by Marcus Lilge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
5.62.39.5 01:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
When something is categorized in the disambiguation category Category:Trap, please don't move it into Category:Males in female clothing unless it's actually a photo of a male in female clothing. There are several different other categories that may be more likely, e.g. Category:Trap music if the picture seems to have to do with rap or hip hop music. -Apocheir (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Du hattest 2017 die Category:Unidentified locations in Dresden entfernt und Category:Pieschen hinzugeführt. Allerdings hast du in der Beschreibung keine Ortsangabe gemacht. Und ich konnte es auch identifizieren – es gibt zwar einiges was sehr ähnlich aussieht, aber dieses Haus konnte ich nicht finden. Wo soll das denn sein? (siehe auch hier) - burts ∞ 15:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Team Bella (cropped1).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:The Singing Rambos (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lastknowphotoofdinaali (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
BevinKacon (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Georg-Christof Bertsch (cropped).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Georg-Christof Bertsch (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Georg-Christof Bertsch (cropped).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jcb (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27092 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC))
Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!
[edit]Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.
Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.
Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-01048, Wilhelm Groener (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]![](http://178.128.105.246/cars-https-upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Commons_File_mover.svg/75px-Commons_File_mover.svg.png)
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!
[edit]Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.
Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.
Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.
Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Action comics 1 cgc 9-point-0 vincent zurzolo (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped6).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (300) (cropped7).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Derbrauni (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Batyrhanfamily (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 22526 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 19749 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 22526 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 19747 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 28561 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 20175 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 21230 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC))
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 30983 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 31512 files.
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC))
![]() |
Porzellanmanufaktur Meißen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Finoskov (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ellywa (talk) 20:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads
[edit]Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Frze/Category:Dresden uploads, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 32396 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC))
![]() |
Reflected photographs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |